Is there a reason to not ban closed-source software?

Eating human eggs is way more ethical than the eggs of other species because humans can consent to you harvesting them.

But the point is that if you’re going to make a villain you can’t get upset when your heroes try to help their victims.

Oh no, I have a really easy means of getting my players organically motivated in my story. :(

I’m not criticizing people who are quietly kind; I’m criticizing the idea that loud people should be quiet.

https://archive.ph/rN8xp

To add to the other post, when someone says something “is praxis” it’s shorthand for good praxis, something that helps people and/or convinces others to be helpful.

I’m not sure if supporting liberation silently is effective.

They’re nuggets for people who are afraid of nuggets.

I’m against industrialized abuse and slaughter of animals, but unseasoned meat is delicious. I don’t think making things up about the flavor is a good argument.

Vegan wings are naturally boneless!

“You should watch Love is Blind so that we have something to talk about.”

You seem to attach a negative meaning to what I’ve said. Compromising values is one way that a person can change and adapt.

I’m saying it can’t combine clothed children and naked adults to make naked children. It doesn’t know what “naked” means. It can’t imagine what something might look like. It can only make naked children if it has been trained on them directly.

It literally can’t combine unrelated concepts though. Not too long ago there was the issue where one (Dall-E?) couldn’t make a picture of a full glass of wine because every glass of wine it had been trained on was half full, because that’s generally how we prefer to photograph wine. It has no concept of “full” the way actual intelligences do, so it couldn’t connect the dots. It had to be trained on actual full glasses of wine to gain the ability to produce them itself.

You think you intentionally made it annoying to read, but you accidentally made it really fun to read.

“More unleserlich.” :3

::: spoilers Pluribus season 1 That’s part of it, yes. It starts when he steals the ambulance, which Carol later points out is hypocritical of him. He realizes she’s right and consciously decides to start making compromises like allowing her cellphone and exploiting collective resources as a means of discovering how to save humanity. It’s a dramatic change from his earlier stance, like how he leaves money in exchange for stolen gas, and it’s executed very well. I don’t think his unwillingness to sin would have gotten him far in his goals, but the defeat of his resolution is still tragic. :::

::: spoilers Pluribus season 1 Nah, he did. But the writers and characters are aware of that. His eventual willingness to compromise his values for the greater good is very on-topic for the themes of the series. :::

Mirror-versions/rotations of letters is a terribly ableist way of designing a writing system.

Why bother yourself with “color” or “colour” when you could choose the Anglish hue?