• kata1yst@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    24 days ago

    What do you think changed?

    From my perspective, people made this and used this in their own homes. It was in cookbooks. Being able to buy it in a store doesn’t change the context of 800+ years of history.

      • kata1yst@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        24 days ago

        But in what way does that change the meaning of the established linguistics? That’s the part I’m struggling to grasp. I understand the commercial milk producers wanting to muddy the waters from a competitive perspective, but why should you or I want almond milk, or other plant based milks, called something not ‘milk’?

          • kata1yst@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            24 days ago

            Hmm. I’m afraid this is where we’re going to disagree. I don’t agree milk needs a legal definition. I don’t agree that consumers need protection from the word ‘milk’ being attached to other products, especially plant based milks that are generally clearly labeled and have hundreds or more years of context in our language.

            Hell. There’s ‘human milk’, ‘goat milk’, ‘yak milk’, etc.

            If something needs to change, it should be that we need to now call it ‘cow milk’ and truly protect the consumer from confusion.

      • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        Unless you’re drinking milk from the cow’s tit, your milk is very mucg an industrial product to make it shelf stable and consistent. People have a totally wrong idea of what real milk feels or tastes like or what’s involved in its production. At least oat milk is literally just filtered porridge you can make at home.