• Zephorah@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    2 days ago

    There should be a mandatory retirement age of 70 for all 3 branches.

    Turning 70 before your potential 4 yr term would be up? Then you cannot run. Same for the senate. We would know ahead of time which Presidential term would be replacing SCOTUS, unless that justice chose to retire early.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Make it the median life expectancy, rather than a fixed, 70 years.

      For the court, leave it at a life term, but remove the size constraint. At the end of the first and third year of every presidential term, add one new justice. This moves the appointment process to a fixed time, so there are no surprises.

      When a justice dies or retires, their seat is removed, not filled. This ensures that an untimely death swings only one seat, not two.

      Since there is no longer an incentive for strategic retirement, the size of the court will increase, probably to around 13 justices. Presidents will want the absolute youngest justices they can get through the Senate.

      The larger size means that whatever swing the court does have from deaths or retirements will be smaller and less impactful than it is now.

      Finally, any circuit court justice has already faced senate confirmation hearings for their current appointment. Any circuit court judge should be eligible to be elevated to the supreme court without an additional senate confirmation. If the Senate wants to play games and reject all of the president’s candidates, the president has a small pool of candidates that can bypass the additional confirmation process

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Although, in this case, his age is a good thing. If he was younger and sharper, then America would be stuck with him for a lot longer.

      • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, but once he hits the cutoff age, he’d be gone. Honestly I think 65 is a better age. We have to die to let the young feast on our lives lived.

      • nickiwest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 days ago

        I feel like if we have a minimum age of 35 for a President, it wouldn’t be unreasonable to have a maximum age of 70, which is double the minimum age.

        I really think that anyone who is eligible to retire and draw Social Security should be aged out of public office. I wish that older people in government would retire and go enjoy their lives.

        The Boomers got that opportunity from the generations before them. (Bill Clinton took office when he was 46. That was 32 years ago.) They have held on to power for far longer than is reasonable. Gen X never really expected to make a difference, but it would have been nice to at least have had the opportunity to try.

    • 5in1k@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, sorry your palm flower is flashing, gotta go before it turns black.