geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days agoFake News. Get your Fake News here.lemmy.mlimagemessage-square27linkfedilinkarrow-up163arrow-down11
arrow-up162arrow-down1imageFake News. Get your Fake News here.lemmy.mlgeneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square27linkfedilink
minus-squarenova_ad_vitum@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·6 days agoBecause when provided with positive evidence of obvious bias, you demanded proof of a negative which is ranges from prohibitively difficult to impossible. This is not a valid form of reasoning. The inability to disprove something is not a valid reason to believe in it. Let me put it another way, I don’t converse with paedophiles so I’m going to need proof that you’ve never diddled kids before we can continue.
minus-squaredrolex@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down6·5 days agoIt was hardly evidence. It was a quip. Let me put it another way, I don’t converse with paedophiles so I’m going to need proof that you’ve never diddled kids before we can continue. Here we go. Amazing and terribly clever.
minus-squareHalosheep@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·5 days agoDamn, no evidence provided. Pedophile confirmed.
Because when provided with positive evidence of obvious bias, you demanded proof of a negative which is ranges from prohibitively difficult to impossible. This is not a valid form of reasoning. The inability to disprove something is not a valid reason to believe in it.
Let me put it another way, I don’t converse with paedophiles so I’m going to need proof that you’ve never diddled kids before we can continue.
It was hardly evidence. It was a quip.
Here we go. Amazing and terribly clever.
Damn, no evidence provided.
Pedophile confirmed.