Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agoA judge has barred Washington from enforcing a state law that would have required Churches to report child abuse. The judge says the law infringed on freedom of religionwashingtonstatestandard.comexternal-linkmessage-square172linkfedilinkarrow-up1641arrow-down112file-textcross-posted to: seattle@lemmy.world
arrow-up1629arrow-down1external-linkA judge has barred Washington from enforcing a state law that would have required Churches to report child abuse. The judge says the law infringed on freedom of religionwashingtonstatestandard.comDavriellelouna@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square172linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: seattle@lemmy.world
minus-squarewomjunru@lemmy.cafeBannedBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoI know what it means. It the law only applies to some people.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoIt literally doesn’t, that’s kind of the point of the ruling.
minus-squarewomjunru@lemmy.cafeBannedBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoThe ruling allows churches to ignore child abuse. This ruling was BAD.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoOkay sure, but why do you have to make false statements in response to the bad ruling? Why do you get upset when people correct you for that?
minus-squarewomjunru@lemmy.cafeBannedBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoWhat false statements? I am not upset at all lol.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoThat its legal to rape and murder, you think thats a factual statement? That catholic priests are gaining special privileges by not facing charges for a law specifically targetting confessionals? You think these are all true?
minus-squarewomjunru@lemmy.cafeBannedBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoYou must be very religious to defend these child fuckers like you are.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoI’m actually opposed to the concept of religion. I’m also opposed to people like you making any specific religion illegal.
minus-squarewomjunru@lemmy.cafeBannedBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoYou’re obviously not listening to me at all. You would allow a religion to rape children and go unpunished as long as that is part of their religion? You should be shot.
I know what it means.
It the law only applies to some people.
It literally doesn’t, that’s kind of the point of the ruling.
The ruling allows churches to ignore child abuse. This ruling was BAD.
Okay sure, but why do you have to make false statements in response to the bad ruling? Why do you get upset when people correct you for that?
What false statements? I am not upset at all lol.
That its legal to rape and murder, you think thats a factual statement? That catholic priests are gaining special privileges by not facing charges for a law specifically targetting confessionals? You think these are all true?
You must be very religious to defend these child fuckers like you are.
I’m actually opposed to the concept of religion. I’m also opposed to people like you making any specific religion illegal.
You’re obviously not listening to me at all.
You would allow a religion to rape children and go unpunished as long as that is part of their religion? You should be shot.