• mynameisbob@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    17 days ago

    He is such a back stabbing condescending out of touch deplorable libturd. He is the only tool I see. In the movie “their will be blood” when Eli slaps his dad for pulling down his pants… and then he slaps the shit out of him… Thats what I want to do to this fool. Computers are for humans NOT humans for computers. Linux is awsome because of humans… No more with the gipity… I’d rather be 2nd place then juiced with a limp dick. HOLD THE LINE AGAINST THE SWINE

    • Stitch0815@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 days ago

      My brother im christ

      Are you ok?

      You do realize who you are talking about. Love him or hate him but Linus Torvalds is THE Linux guy

      I hate that these discussion often seem to happen in a vaccuum regarding the person.

      This man has spent over 30 years writing/maintaining the Kernel. He most certainly knows more than yoi about the kernel the maintainablility and maybe most importantly: The community

      Take it down a notch will ya?

      • nevyn@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        People are disappointed that Linus is pro ai, and are concerned that their operating systems are going to become a part of the problem, rather than the solution, or at least the suggestion of hope that Linux is meant to be. Decent options (in many respects) are becoming increasingly rare, when they should have increased. Look at the big players pushing ai, they are not good people.

        • kshade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          People are disappointed that Linus is pro ai

          Being “pro AI” in my book goes a lot further than what they are doing. Using generative “AI” for coding with human oversight and the high standard of code review they have is a far cry from wanting to cram LLM slop into everything as much as possible. I think it’s good that they are trying to find security issues like this, for example.

          • nevyn@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 days ago

            Many people expected and were interested in the development of ai, it was inevitable, and frequently included in science fiction. But as per usual… humans are why we cannot have nice things. The environmental cost of ai is far too detrimental at this stage of its development, especially due to the amount of dickbrains using it for pointless crap. Really bad people are behind it. That is really simple. People are still capable of thinking are they not?