• Netrunner@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    6 days ago

    China stealing anything loses any bite when you realize every AI company stole everything and is supported by the Government.

    RAM prices will fall now, this is good news. Fuck the cartel.

  • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    This was easy to predict.

    Chinese government is not stupid. They have a strategy (more so than USA does). Years ago that was to dominate global manufacturing and supply chains. They were successful. Now the goal is to reach parity with Western chipmakers and/or get ahead. It’s happening.

    The AI boom was like a golden gift to them. Semiconductor prices are through the roof. So if they can produce almost anything at all in quantity it will sell for inflated prices.

    While the tech companies of the world jerk each other off with AI, China is building DRAM capacity. CXMT is the first and will not be the last. They will scale quickly. If they have the process perfected they will build a fab in the time it takes USA to conduct the environmental review for the consideration of allowing a permit application to build a fab. They will not build one fab they will build 5 or 10. I’m proud to be American and I love my country but I compare USA to China on the ability to execute large projects like this and China will win every time. We have too much red tape, too many lawsuits and insurance and moving parts. China executes faster and more decisively.

    So give it a year or two and China will have a fleet of pretty good fabs. They will sell memory for way less than what the others do. And then just as China made themselves indispensable for manufacturing, they will make themselves indispensable for DRAM.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      6 days ago

      There’s also the issue of things not necessarily having to be the MOST profitable thing ever. Memory manufacturers decided to go to the highest bider because money. I suspect Chinese company will be quite happy to just flood the market with cheaply priced (relatively speaking) products and just get everyone’s money.

      • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 days ago

        This 100%.

        HBM has massive profit margins. It’s also hard as hell to make, as it involves multiple stacked wafers. This vid is a good catchup on that and the rest of this situation.

        China will HAPPILY flood the non-HBM DRAM market with memory ‘only’ 2x as expensive as last year. And every PC maker, automaker, gadget maker, etc will happily buy it because as Valve famously put it, “They give us a price every month or something, and they say ‘you can buy that many’ and it’s yes or no, and if we say no then they never talk to us again.” Source interview. If China says ‘we have consistent price, we have consistent supply, we can meet your needs’ and the quality is decent then it doesn’t matter if it’s slower or DDR4 or whatever people will love them for it.

        And play that ahead.
        The big 3 are focused on HBM and most of their capacity is already sold through 2027
        If China can scale up production of standard DDR4/5 and sell it reliably at 200% of normal price (aka, below current market rates) then there’s less incentive to build fabs. So they will let China have the consumer market with their blessings. And thus China will have made themselves essential in yet another product supply chain.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I suspect Chinese company will be quite happy to just flood the market with cheaply priced (relatively speaking) products and just get everyone’s money.

        And will still be able to make a very healthy profit by doing that.

        The quest for “max_profit” is not (and never has been) sustainable.

    • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Much of that red tape is there for good reason. It protects our natural resources and our citizens. I don’t disagree the US could do better, but things like environmental studies are important to ensure healthy growth, not just rapid. AI data center bullshit happening right now is a perfect example of the impact and destruction of steamrolling these things.

      • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        In general I agree- the concept of red tape, environmental evaluations, etc is a good thing.

        But we all know what the road to Hell is paved with.

        Key is to find a middle ground- that lets a fab be built in an environmentally friendly way but also rapidly.

      • Archimedes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        6 days ago

        As an earlier post pointed out - the Ai industry stole everything with the support of the government at our expense. The point is moot.

        If the Chinese theft benefits us as consumers then they are the Robin Hood of computation hardware. The good guys.

        They didn’t steal from “us”. They stole from the billionaires. I’m fine with it.

        • Smaile@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yah I used to be on the “China steals” bandwagon, back when it had weight but now it doesn’t matter, even when it come to Chinas genocide of the ueagers, America is helping cause gaza with isreal not to mention what its doing to Cuba. America is no better then China now in my eyes.

          • witnessradiant650@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Americans, and I say this as an American, have always been ignorant and hypocritical in what the US government has done and is continuing to do.

          • ManixT@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 days ago

            Yeah, I’m with you on this. China has been a much more responsible member of the international community than the US. I strongly disagree with what China is doing with regard to Taiwan, the South China Sea, and suppression of free expression, but otherwise they’re the lesser of two evils.

            • Smaile@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              I wouldn’t say theyre lesser, I’d say their a out as bad as eachother tho. China is a lot better then it used to be to add to that

      • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        The concept of IP is theft to begin with. No technology arises from a vacuum, it is all built on the collective efforts of humanity through the ages. The fact that some billionaire can claim ownership over an idea is a moral failing of capitalism.

        • ManixT@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yeah, I generally agree with you. Just seems unfair that China gets to reap the rewards for the efforts of people working elsewhere. The fact that billionaires just pocket all the rewards anyway makes that point a bit moot.

          • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 days ago

            As a member of the working class, I don’t particularly mind if a socialist country reaps the rewards of my work. Also, it’s not like IP is a zero-sum game, and that an idea put into use in one place means it can’t be put into use in another. It’s like ancient Babylon getting mad at Sumeria for putting seeds into the ground.

    • Geologist@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 days ago

      RAM is a commodity, so if this stuff is produced in large quantities, it will affect the global market by lowering China’s demand for imported RAM.

      Same as oil and gas, even if North America will never import Iranian product, their prices are affected by that stuff not reaching the market in Asia or whatever and driving up the Asian demand for oil elsewhere.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 days ago

      They won’t sell it to you

      China is a major consumer of RAM. If they can supply it domestically, that has the potential to reduce the volume of global imports and subsequent price pressure.

      If their competitors can’t keep up, you will eventually see Chinese RAM get out onto the secondary market in the same way Chinese EVs and Chinese cell phones and Chinese solar panels and Chinese steel have depressed global prices for these commodities.

      • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        If their competitors can’t keep up

        Their competitors have already sold out their entire 2027 production.

        The money they make selling RAM to private consumers is not even 1 promille of their revenue.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Their competitors have already sold out their entire 2027 production.

          Plenty of which will inevitably turn up on the secondary market.

          The money they make selling RAM to private consumers is not even 1 promille of their revenue.

          The RAM they sell to home-labbers and hobbyists, sure. The RAM they’re selling to Dell and Lenovo and Apple? A significantly higher chunk of their revenues. But that’s a side issue. These kinds of RAM sticks are largerly fungible.

          The new high end AI datacenters are building out specialty hardware that isn’t PC compatible. And the real worry is that these firms migrate over to the AI datacenter designs in a way that causes a semi-permanent shortage on the independent PC side.

          • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Interesting. I have heard that hardware manufacturers create specific chip architecture to suit AI technology.

            Though I had not considered that the hardware might shift so much as to be rendered “useless” for the average consumer

      • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        You see, that is in your own words crap, they keep the good stuff for themselves.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          There is some decent Chinese stuff. Sometimes it’s hard to know though with the flood of crap. For example Anker seems consistently decent, but anything that sounds like Qihoon or Xiyomao or whatever random brand word they pop into existence on the other hand…

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          they keep the good stuff for themselves.

          Do they? If anything, I believe China’s been exporting the high-end luxury items because they have absurd margins in western markets. Meanwhile, the good-enough goods stay at home, because it isn’t worth the time or effort to sail them across the ocean and market them.

          I guess Temu and its peers have changed that, to a degree. But so much Temu crap just gets bought up by local American drop-shippers, marked up to American prices, and rebranded as western equivalent merch that it feels like much the same.

    • dai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah that’s probably a sad truth for those in the good ol’ USA.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Nothing a import ban can’t fix.

      Just because the US bans something, that doesn’t stop the rest of the world from buying.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          What I want though is memory prices to go back down here.

          A price war might lead in that direction.

          • MehBlah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Just like that price war between american cars and all those Chinese ones they let be imported. The whole point of import bans in the US is to prevent a true free market.

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      This is totally going to happen. And there is nothing you can do as far as spying with memory but I guarantee they will come up with some bullshit excuse related to that. I mean the only thing I can think of is some sort of kill switch but that would just kill the machine. Do that enough and nobody buys your RAM so what would be the point. Maybe just plain market manipulation but that’s pretty much happening now.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      let’s be honest, these are already banned by the Chinese device ban that banned routers.

      but, truthfully, if I can’t even trust Chinese IP cams to not snoop on me, why would I trust RAM?

  • PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Is it normal to refer to Taiwanese RAM manufacturers as “Western”?

    I’m glad they distinguish it from China obviously, but calling G.Skill and MSI Western feels kinda weird.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Sort of the joke in the modern US attitude towards Taiwan. They see a break-away province and have no actual respect for their sovereignty. Independent small nations are just colonies-up-for-grabs in the eyes of the US State Department.

    • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      They do so because while the manufacturing is taking place in Taiwan, the blueprints are not.

      It’s why we call iPhone american phones. Despite them being manufactured in China

    • minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yes, they chose to put themselves, economically and politically, within the western sphere of influence. It is not geographic. Weirdness is from your ignorance of geopolitics.

    • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Afaik Chinese DDR4 ram production is already keeping prices in that segment sane. They are working to break the ASML monopoly and sanctions on extreme violet light lithography to make the most advances chips and then will ramp up production. They are churning out like 10 times more engineers than the US and EU. They are ramping up but not sure when they will be able to compete at the highest level. I read 2030 earliest.

      • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Wonder if a consumer can get around the tariff. If the price is too high, it becomes more economical to pay a bit extra for a roundabout way of getting it.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          Gray market imports into the US from China have already been big business, especially among counterfeiters and drop-shippers. Idk about getting a full-sized SUV over the border. But designer bags, electronics, and the like have been coming over for at least a decade.

          Idk how much retail buyers save, though. Much like with the drug trade and human trafficking, there’s inevitably an enormous mark-up for this kind of smuggling. And because it is functionally unregulated, you get a ton of refurbished, low-grade, and outright fraudulent sales. Smuggling tends to accrue money to the smugglers and the various officials you need to bribe to move the merchandise. You rarely see retail level discounts, unless the market is so glutted with knock-offs.

          • turmacar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            RAM has not come from China, and China isn’t exporting much of it yet. Unless Canada and the EU and Japan and everyone else is also handing out tariffs on Taiwan, Korea, etc like the US is, their point was the price of RAM doesn’t have anything to do with tariffs.

            The price of RAM is high globally because the AI companies have bought future-RAM with money the RAM producing companies gave them to build data centers that don’t exist yet.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    There is so much over investment in memory its going to be dirt cheap again in 2028

    • Bitswap@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      This is simply not true. All the major players are not investing in production. They are simply letting the demand stack and prices to rise.

      China entering the market will help some, but expect these chips to be banned quite quickly in the western world for fear of communists. They are already blacklisted by many companies.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yes they are. Samsung and SK hynix are building 4 new fabs I’m Korea 1 in the US. Sandisk and kioxia are building extra capacity in Japan. Micron is building new fan in the US. Its nearly a trillion in investment for additional capacity. These are expected to hit the market in 2027 and 2028 with lag to backfill demand.

        Chinese ram will be good but not good enough to block it. Business will keep buying the high preformance stuff and consumers can have the cheap modules but they buy so little it won’t affect anything.

        • Bitswap@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Exactly. Expected to hit the market in 2027 and 2028. This investment in fabs happened years ago. For example, Samsung invested in the Taylor fab (which should start production, a little early, late this year) back in 2021. Samsung KRW6 was announced this year, but thats a new technology, not new capacity. You cant build and turn on a fab in the short term.

          • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            6 days ago

            Can we just appreciate how you first told him he’s wrong for suggesting memory will be cheap again in 2028.

            Only to immediately try to frame it as “memory won’t be cheap until 2028 so that proves my point!”

            Which is exactly what he said to begin with. Top notch. 👌

            • Bitswap@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              I fully disagree that memory will be cheap in 2028. Please feel free to come and ping this thread in 2028 to tell me Im wrong.

              My firm belief is that memory will continue to increase in price through the end of 2027 and likely level out in 2028. The price will not go ‘down’ in the next few years.

              New technologies will be introduced, but all consumers and corporations want the latest and greatest. Demand will far outstrip supply for the foreseeable future.

              Edit: just to add, if you keep up with the news and financial disclosurers, all the output from those new fabs has already been presold to the usual suspects.

              • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                Please feel free to come and ping this thread in 2028 to tell me Im wrong.

                I’m honoured you think I’m petty enough to dig up a 2 year old post just to say “i told you so” to some random user on the Internet.

                But unfortunately I’m only mortal. I’ll leave that kind of pursuit to the bots.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 days ago

      I eagerly await the 64GB mouse driver and the 5000PB home NAS for the discerning hoarder of the output of /dev/rnd

    • Bilb!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m not sure what would stop them from charging whatever they can, which will be a lot.

      More competitors should create more downward pressure on what memory manufacturers can charge, but even with new entrants there still aren’t that many.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m not sure what would stop them from charging whatever they can

        Undercutting the competition to gain market share is a time tested business strategy.

        • Bilb!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Sure, but unless there’s a surplus of supply they’ll sell their full capacity without doing that. I hope there is, though, or at least that demand for RAM chips will go down soon.

    • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      That would officially be WW3, and it wouldn’t go well for the US.

      Pretty much the entire world either dislikes or outright hates the US right now, and that’s not going to change anytime soon. There’s far more positive sentiment towards China around the world than towards the US.

    • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      The US could never bring such a fantasy to reality. Anyone who still believes they could after the debacle with Iran should apply for a cabinet position.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    The Chinese government being much more fans of a directed market than of a totally unregulated one (neither of which is a Free Market by the way - that thing only exists when barriers to market entry are incredibly low, and it’s not as if any Jack or Joe can set up their very own memory production cottage factory in their backyard, so it’s not possible for there to be a Free Market in RAM under current technology), they’ll probably make sure that RAM only ever leaves China as part of more complex products (i.e. computers, smartphones, tablets and so on) made in China, thus making also Made In China for those product lines be more competitive.

    (In other words, want a gaming PC or smartphone with more memory - buy the whole thing from China or pay 10x more)

    If properly managed this could boost quite a lot more digital electronics industries in China than merelly RAM.

    • wicked@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      they’ll probably make sure that RAM only ever leaves China as part of more complex products

      Which other components are subject to this limitation in China?

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s about complex products which contain RAM rather than other component.

        Anything made in China which has RAM in it will have its price affected by the price of RAM so if Chinese brands of such products have access to cheaper RAM than non-Chinese brands, they can outcompete the latter on price whilst delivering similar quality products.

        Personally I tend to assemble my own desktop PCs, but for example in the past when buying a Mini-PC I would pick a Chinese brand one if cheaper since the quality is the same. Now imagine if the Chinese brand is now 1/2 the price of the non-Chinese one because the former uses RAM from China whose price is nowhere as high as the hyper-inflated South Korean RAM - in this kind of device were the quality is the same, the Chinese product will always be the better option if it’s half the price because of using way cheaper RAM.

        • emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          Honestly it’ll probably be more like 3 or 4 times cheaper. I’m excited for the effects of this to start to balloon outwards. Now China just needs a graphics card/GPU manufacturer that can be competitive.