To not be there, they’d have to make a choice about which altercations they ought to attend. Does that really sound like a good idea? If there’s a protest with a risk to person or property it seems sensible for a police force to attend to mitigate that risk.
There’s a lot of criticisms to be made of any police force, and it’s absolutely proper and right to do so in a democracy (even if that’s not how things roll on .ml), but expecting them not to attend a protest just because your opinions align with the protesters is pretty daft.
What’s pathetic is you have no clue what solidarity is and are probably lonely AF and having bad faith arguments online where you never learn from other people.
To not be there, they’d have to make a choice about which altercations they ought to attend. Does that really sound like a good idea? If there’s a protest with a risk to person or property it seems sensible for a police force to attend to mitigate that risk.
There’s a lot of criticisms to be made of any police force, and it’s absolutely proper and right to do so in a democracy (even if that’s not how things roll on .ml), but expecting them not to attend a protest just because your opinions align with the protesters is pretty daft.
Is that not what they already do?
Who are police mitigating risk for?
The parties who are at risk I guess.
Do these parties have names? Or do you plan to answer in another circle?
I’m not answering in a circle, I’m pointing out the absurdity of your question.
If you have a point then make it.
Childish boot licker
Hah. Pathetic.
I thought you actually had something to say but it seems you just parrot what everyone else says.
What’s pathetic is people like you that refuse to understand hundreds of years of police burtiliziing laborers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_worker_deaths_in_United_States_labor_disputes
What’s pathetic is you have no clue what solidarity is and are probably lonely AF and having bad faith arguments online where you never learn from other people.
God I’d hate to be burtilized.
I’m not defending police violence. That’s not what’s happening in this photo though.
Ad hominem, a classic faith argument.