Pierre-Yves Lapersonne@programming.devM to Opensource@programming.dev · 5 days agoCopyrightability of LLM-generated code: Can we license “vibe code” into Free Software?fsfe.orgexternal-linkmessage-square4linkfedilinkarrow-up134arrow-down12 cross-posted to: opensource@lemmy.mlprogramming@programming.dev
arrow-up132arrow-down1external-linkCopyrightability of LLM-generated code: Can we license “vibe code” into Free Software?fsfe.orgPierre-Yves Lapersonne@programming.devM to Opensource@programming.dev · 5 days agomessage-square4linkfedilink cross-posted to: opensource@lemmy.mlprogramming@programming.dev
minus-squareslacktoid@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·5 days agoLLM code must be GPLv3, or whatever is the most protective/restrictive license used in the training dataset code.
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·5 days agoYep. Either that or the entire model is poisoned and nothing generated from it can be used at all. Either way, there is no reasonable legal interpretation where LLMs could be used to launder copyleft inputs into non-copyleft outputs.
LLM code must be GPLv3, or whatever is the most protective/restrictive license used in the training dataset code.
Yep. Either that or the entire model is poisoned and nothing generated from it can be used at all.
Either way, there is no reasonable legal interpretation where LLMs could be used to launder copyleft inputs into non-copyleft outputs.