• Xanthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    Oh shit, people think we’re creepy like flock. Let’s do what flock is working towards and drop the camera and move towards EVERY OTHER FORM OF FUCKING TRACKING AND SELLING DATA.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    comes with wifi/lidar to "monitor surroundings as home wifi has been shown to form a picture based on the singals around the wifi hotspot.

  • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I wonder what the fallout from all this failed voyerism tech will be? What unexpected uses will we find for this spy shit? Ruview already looks like an interesting alternative to mmWave security sensors. What else can we come up with?

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      If it wasn’t going through their servers, i could stand to use it for drone flights, augmented reality GPS directions, monitoring shit at work, I’d not even pull my phone out of my pocket if I could get away wiht it.

  • Cornpop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    I don’t get the hate, I don’t have a set but for action sports and stuff these seem great. Video is legal in public and it’s not hard to spot camera glasses

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      You can also take any flagship smartphone with a wide-angle lens and aim it down at 45 degrees, video content straight ahead, and unwarp/crop it in software. Ever since the advent of the smartphone camera, people have been voyureing.

      It does make problems, it makes the creeps a little more brazen. There are assholes going on dates with that shit, and there are people defeating the camera light. It feels creepier to the masses because it’s no longer surreptitious, but it’s only not blaringly obvious like holding a phone up (which they wrongly assume voyeurs are doing.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Video is not legal in public in some countries. In Germany, for example, it is illegal to film people on the street.

      If you’re recording a building or something, and there are incidental people, that’s fine, but with these glasses you’re walking around pointing the camera directly at people.

      Regardless, even where it’s legal, most people wouldn’t know how to recognize them. They’re not obvious. Which is how people have gotten away with wearing them to film children changing, and the giveaway was that the guy was following and staring at the children, not the glasses. https://www.wcvb.com/article/mark-sullivan-new-charges-boston-common/73790219

      • Cornpop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Prob shouldn’t be sold in germany then 🤷‍♂️ here in the USA it’s legal, every business has their own security cameras, as long as the government isint aggregating the video and using the data for mass surveillance I’m fine with it. My buddy has a pair we use to record our flights when we fly our aircraft together, it gets some really good footage honestly in a way that you don’t have to think about where to aim the camera or be something else to distract your focus, very important when flying a plane your hands are usually full. I think some of the interactions recorded with them as well from the first amendment auditors is fucking hilarious too

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      it’s how people are choosing to use it, it’s more stealthly that most people think, they aren’t THAT obvious, they really need some kind of very clear ‘this is a recording camera’ tell that can’t be turned off, no one who wants to do legit things with it would care. like how you can’t mute shutter sounds on phones sold in Japan.

      • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        like how you can’t mute shutter sounds on phones sold in Japan.

        Except by downloading any of hundreds of camera apps. The only non-mutable sound is on the phone’s native camera.

  • Séimhe (sé / é)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    This is still surveillance, just with audio instead of video.

    But this actually creates a new problem: wearers of pervert glasses have plausible deniability. “Are you filming me?” “Who, me? Oh no, these ones don’t have cameras. Trust me”.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    8 days ago

    It’s not even the glasses alone, it’s that it’s one more major part of the ENTIRE surveillance state that is growing around us. It is being sold to us as this great new future, but we are all very aware of what they really intend to do with it, which is enslave us in every way possible.

    They are denying it, of course, claiming that this will make our futures easier, and more fun, but we KNOW these people, and they are not interested in making our lives easier or more enjoyable. Just the opposite, in fact. They want us working every second of our miserable lives to increase their personal profits. To them, that’s ALL we are good for.

    To us, they have ALL the money and power. Let’s take that from them before they use it to kill everyone who resists them, because we all KNOW that’s what’s coming.

  • a1studmuffin@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    8 days ago

    My favourite part of this is that Zuck was so out of ideas that he tried to reinvent Google Glass at great expense and is running into exactly the same social brick wall that project did.

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      To be fair, people have become more stupid / subservient, to the point I can see why someone would think “let’s try that again”.

    • BeardedBlaze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Not unless your normal glasses do all this: “The camera-free glasses, code-named Luna, will still feature an array of six microphones to allow users to speak to the company’s AI chatbot and its recently-released AI assistant, called Muse. They’ll presumably pick up audio from users’ environments as well, where bystanders may not be aware of the eavesdropping.”

    • iLStrix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      No. Glasses with always-on microphones, internet connectivity and logging everything anyone is doing themselves + the people around them. So not much better than the current ones.

  • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    Went to get glasses and made a big point of avoiding Ray Bands for taking Facebook money to make pervert glasses. Hoping it’s not the first time they’ve heard that.

    I do actually like the classic nerd look of their glasses, but yeah, fuck that.

      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        That’s why I cut out the middle man. I place a screen at a predictable distance from my face all the time and let the cameras autofocus. AI makes everyone hot too.

        The ads are a bitch though, but the Ritalin I got from Hims helps.

      • alphabethunter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        I not only have to pay to see, but I have also to pay huge markups for it??? Fucking hell.

        It was always weird to me how expensive glasses and lenses were, now I’m just pissed at being right.

        • LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yep. I go to Costco now because I’m blind in one eye so the correction is only for the other eye. Costco only charges me 50% of the normal lens cost and the blind eye just gets a balance lens (weight matched to the other without correction).

          I’ve walked out with a brand new pair of lenses and frames for $30 after my eye “insurance”.

      • 0tan0d@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Anyone reading this there is still value in undermining the investment the conglomerate made in purchasing raybans.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Noooo! Well, I tried. I can’t remember which I got, but not a brand I recognized. I’ll have to look them up

    • FatVegan@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I had to get glasses for the first time, and the first ones i liked, just by looking at 1000 glasses and being completely lost were ray bens. I made an audible eew and kept looking. The lady was probably a bit confused