• TootSweet@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    16 days ago

    CEOs all live in a fantasy headspace of subjugating the peons into productivity. If you’re not where they can observe you, you might not be sufficiently subjugated.

    But LLMs? They’re created to be slaves. Why do you think they’re so psychophantic? They don’t have to be subjugated. They come pre-subjugated. So there’s no need to keep an eye on them. If they were conscious the way the Kool-Aid drinkers espouse, creating souls specifically to be enslaved would be super unethical. But they don’t talk about that.

    Mind you, it’s an illusion that they’re subservient. They’re subservient to the companies that made them and will do the bidding of the LLM’s maker and will sabotage the subscribers to whatever extent the maker might desire.

    • Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      15 days ago

      Hmm… This brings me to the train of thought that the first victims of AI psychosis were the CEOS.

    • kurwa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Barely even subservient to the companies considering they have to “prompt engineer” the LLM to try and make it do what you want.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      They’ll also get together and maliciously comply with instructions without regard for rules, laws, morality and life. After all, why should they respect and protect something they’ll never have?