• egregiousRac@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s really just increased media scrutiny. There are similar food recalls constantly and as someone who at least skims every one I haven’t noticed a significant uptick in frequency or severity.

    Screwworm is an actual problem caused by their actions. Additionally, all the inevitable recalls of ‘raw’ food are more significant with them actively boosting it. Neither of those shifts the safety of groceries, however.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      theres also significantly less inspectors, since msot of them were fired. only when it gets too severe, like people getting sick or dying is when they “suddenly” reported.

      • egregiousRac@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Most recalls were already packaging issues (product A in B’s package, causing allergen issues) or physical debris, both of which are customer-reported.

        Most of the day-to-day monitoring of plant output is self-testing, which doesn’t change overnight. It will slip as people get lazy, but that takes time.

        I worry that cuts will actually reduce recalls. Most bacterial recalls come from the government tracing what sick people ate.