• Jiral@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      From the car centric US point of view,yes. However, being able to get everywhere anytime by car and be able to park anywhere is fundamentally incompatible with having a non-car centric city. It is two sides of the same coin. NYC is pretty much the only major city in the US where a large area is actually not totally car-centric.

  • NateNate60@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Shockingly, residents of a city with extensive, reliable, and affordable public transit, choose to use it.

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Except the people in Queens for some reason. It’s not even geographically isolated the way Staten Island is, I wonder what’s up with that.

      • paranoia@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        In Queens and Staten Island there is substantially more parking available for free, they’re neighbourhoods with more standard American detached homes and driveways.

        In NYC itself, owning a car is pointless as you can get anywhere faster by either walking, cycling or metro, and you won’t need to play the “drive around for an hour game” to find a parking spot. The richest New Yorkers will tend to live in newer buildings which have underground carparks and a space associated with them, or the option to rent one.

      • SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        While I’m certainly in favour of transit, I think this shows the opposite: households with the money for a vehicle have a vehicle; households without do not.

        Queens is perhaps less dense, making ownership of a vehicle (parking etc) more feasible.

        • f314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          There might be several reasons for that connection. For example, if you rarely need or use a car it is natural that only those with fuck toy-money would prioritize buying one. They buy it because they might as well, not because they have to.

          If public transport was insufficient, or it was easier to use a car, those numbers might look very different.

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Manhattan is obviously the richest borough but people largely don’t drive there because it’s expensive and annoying to find parking, and there’s the congestion charge, and there’s always a subway station within a five minute walk.

      • XelaReko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Busses suck. They are inconsistent and rarely go where you need. Usually it is just easier to drive, as much as I hate to admit it.

        • Jiral@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Busses don’t suck, if busses are stuck, traffic planning sucks. Busses have higher capacity in a well working system than cars. If you have capacity issues on the road, you needed bus only lanes. That would not reduce but actually increase street capacity, while removing the brakes from the busses.

        • Crankenstein@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Busses themselves don’t suck. Busses are fantastic when they are planned properly and have the infrastructure built to support them.

          If your local bus system sucks, then it’s a poorly implemented system that needs to be fixed.

  • jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I’ve lived here for most of my adult life and never felt like I needed a car.

    Having one is a huge pain. Parking. Insurance. Gas. Maintenance. Getting home when you’re drunk.

    It’s easier to just get on the train.

    I’d like if transit was cheaper and more reliable outside the city. Visiting family in the suburbs via transit is slower and more expensive.