For context: I habe a PC with an 8gb SSD and I somehow need to get an app on there that only has a flatpak release

    • Luffy@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Sort of, actually

      I was trying to build a PC just to play internet radio on using Shortwave, and a 30€ thin client with 4 1,5Ghz cores and no active cooling, 4 gigs of ram and an 8gb ssd were more than enough for that

  • pastaq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    You hate people who spend hundreds of ours of their free time developing software, who then release that software for free, under no obligation to you or anyone else, and your reasoning is because they provide it in a packaging solution you don’t find ideal?

    Maybe fuck off and write your own software.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      No, they hate flatpak, one of the many option to distribute software, which is not the only one even if you consider the “must run on many distro” restriction (which isn’t 100% true, kinda like the Java write once run anywhere). There are other options, some more involved, some simpler, to do so.

      They didn’t say they hate devs, that’s on you, grabbing a febble occasion to tell someone that voiced his opinion to “fuck off”.

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Flatpak seems to be the best choice for consistency and to have it working straight out of the box. I think Linux currently needs this because we’re getting a lot less tech-savvy Linux users nowadays. Don’t get me wrong; package managers should still be used, but how are we going to get people to change if they run into package conflicts or accidentally uninstall a wrong package?