He raped a 15 year old girl and then failed to show for court. He is using anti-US rhetoric to shift the issue to anything other than his crimes.

The excuse for Russia’s war was “De-Nazification.” It is literally taking them longer to “De-Nazify” Ukraine than it did for them to De-Nazify Nazi Germany and all of the 3rd Reich. Russia today is weak compared to what she once was.

My personal email is neither. I use a very small company that’s located in a different country and who speaks a different language. It is a paid service but the cost is very small.

This map doesn’t look like the Russian backed government is doing okay:

https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1NI5R3Zb6v2d6effVqrmvrFG6T2ZGRsU&ll=12.572036203249803%2C-2.4126179638585388&z=6

Russia’s military capacity has a lot of variables. Adoption of drone warfare is one component. Population, popular support, healthy economics, logistics, etc. all play a part. Russia can improve in one niche and still regress overall.

deleted by creator

My poor family has to reach me on Briar.

If I were a lawyer arguing against the law in court, my primary argument would be that this violates the interstate commerce section of the US Constitution.

My job requires it.

The US maintains four military bases in Bulgaria. You can talk once Bulgarians do to these bases what happened to Russia in Mali.

Your own military bloggers are sounding the alarm bell. Besides, a healthy Russia doesn’t lose control of Mali & Moldova in the same week.

At this pace, Russia can keep “proving us wrong” for the next 200 years and still not achieve victory!

The Gulf States are partnering with Ukraine for drone technology, not Russia. Russia may be making advances, but at a rate much slower than Ukraine, which is why Russia still has not achieved the aims of this stupid war.

Your list should include pros and cons. Which is your country?

If, over the next 10 years, your country became more and more like China, would you go along with the changes? Would you have any problems with the transformation?

Are you aware that the word meat is also use to describe the fleshy part of an edible plant?

How a word is used matters. For Catholics, it is carne, any warm blooded land animal.

When using the word, different people mean different things. Catholics are not making scientific statements when talking about meatless Fridays. Scientists are not trying to upset culinary experts who include fleshy edible plants.

Just wait until they realize the American public school system adopted all the bad policies that enabled institutional abuse in the first place.

Just let them resign and move on to another school district.

Ever wonder why so many “teachers of the year” winners are later convicted of abuse? It is called “emotional congruency with a minor.”

Edit: Your downvotes are just denial, but it doesn’t make the problem go away.

It would be nice to at least get another update.

Catholics who don’t eat meat during Lent.

Theoretically, this would actually help the bottom 80% of Americans whose livelihoods are not coupled with asset ownership.