Fedegenerate

You can tell they don’t understand capitalism very well, by their support of capitalism

There’s a joke I’m riffing off, that Christians read the bible to reinforce their belief in God. What do atheists read to reinforce their lack of belief? The same.

deleted by creator

Sum total of my hardware:

Ugreen dxp 4800, the Pentium one. 32gb ram. My main box: jellyfin, arrs, immich, pihole, nginx, etc… It can’t go down. I don’t think I want an LLM here.

Beelink n100 16gb ram. Local back up, redundant pihole, immich machine learning… Generally under utilised, I’d like to move some services around, does proxmox have an auto balancer?!

Spare no name n100. 8, or 16gb, I can’t remember. Abandoned box, It’s what I would put the LLM on, I did have it reserved for a remote back up.

I think it would need a ram upgrade, see corporate AI pricing me out of personal computing. Currently Amazon has a Crucial 32gb ddr5 sodimm module for £280. Which is too high a price for what I’d use it for.

Oh, and I have an abandoned gaming rig with a gtx970, and some rPi0/3s

I’ve put Ollama on an n100 before. It obviously ate all of that box and made everything on it chug, and it was too slow for human use. But if it’s just generating logs, and resetting containers then I wouldn’t mind how slow it is.

I’ve been dreaming of local AI for a hot minute. Sadly corporate AI has priced me out of personal computing, and current hardware isn’t up to it.

Maybe my n100 could, I don’t really care how slow it’s generating the tokens if it’s just resetting containers and logging errors.

Does your setup handle automagic updates, how do you handle prompt injection if so? Or, just error correction/logging?

I appreciate this isn’t an AMA, I don’t expect an answer. But, beyond rashes are there any other ill effects?

Just respect animal’s personal space. Gesture that you would like to pet them, they’re not _that dumb, they either move into the pets or move away, accept the answer.

Sure. If you actively turn it on, and all involved know it’s on. But this is always active as far as I’m aware.

I’m guessing it’ll be toggle off, and it’ll toggle itself back on every update.

In other words, they’re taking your data for their use all the time, and sometimes they’ll share your data with you.

I thought that’s what the GN review did. A paper spec trying to match the Steam Machine, it comes out cheaper and lacks power constraints. They specifically do not reccomend the paper spec as an entry level build though, presumably because they could get more for less, the aim was to match the SM

1-1.5k buys you an awful lot of mini pc. Beelink/minis forum/mini-producers are well situated to compete against the SM if they want. That’s the comparisons I’m waiting for.

I’m sure there’s more than a little Baader-Meinhof happening. I did expand my privacy a bit; pihole, searxng, some other stuff and I notice it less now. Or I think I do, humans are notoriously bad at this.

Honestly, I thought they already did that.

One of my motivations for becoming more privacy minded, was the amount of times a subject of conversation was delivered through an algorithm later.

It was creepy, talk about hose pipes> receive hosepipe content/ads.

You can tell he’s no threat to the establishment by how the establishment treats him. If he were a threat, we wouldn’t be hearing this ‘king of the north’ stuff.

It could be the Guardian manufacturing consent for Burnham. Or, they could be talking with Labour MPs off the record. Sure, Starmer hasn’t announced anything, but anyone who know, KNOWS.

I don’t really know where I land on The Guardian, they’re mostly factual so probably the latter. Do they have a wealthy owner, for whom Burnham is particularly advantagous, to justify manufacturing the consent?

He announced his resignation, it was probably the latter

Steven Hartley has a Lemmy account? Jack Denny maybe?

deleted by creator

A hosting service for games. Feed it games and it allows you to download them from your server, manage saves, emulate in browser… A bunch of stuff. It’s a good project.

Dopamine management system

Ah well, allow me to subvert that suggestion.

Expressly and unequivocally, threesomes are not something I particularly talk about when talking to bi/pan people.

Certainly not any more than anyone else. It isn’t something I voluntarily suggest we do, it’s not something I expressly ask about. Some of my friends have had threesomes, and some of those are bi/pan. So it’s not something I’ve not talked about, it’s just not the first thing that comes to mind.

I don’t really know how guy unicorns are targeted? Are they? I’ve only heard of the term unicorn being applied to women. But, I’m adjacent to the space at best.

Has cucking, becoming more fashionable, increased couples targeting bulls the same way unicorns are? As in toxically.

I suppose it’s different, a unicorn is expected to attended to both partners equally. Whereas, a bull isn’t really.

This is both off topic, and a Wendy’s. I don’t expect an answer.

I didn’t think the /s was necessary… I thought the “we like your vibe” was cliche unicorn hunter speak. I even used the word ‘unicorn’.

Anyways I fully agree, hence how I framed it. I fully apologise if I came off as anything other than tongue in cheek.

Is there a, err, nsfw instance? Asking, like, for a friend.