And resolute desk

Removed by mod

Holy shit, could you imagine

That seems entirely unrelated to anything that I’m saying.

Maybe, if they were extremely disingenuous, one could make the argument that the Autobahn, which is still in use today, Materially improves people’s lives, and that this refutes my point that the nazis didn’t advocate for the material interests of the German people. Maybe.

But it was also not necessarily built for that. (War production benefits from internal infrastructure as well)

But that doesn’t impact the overall character of what I’m saying.

Look, liberals are wrong to support a genocide abroad, full stop. Liberal (and conservative, of course) politicians should face trial at the Hague for war crimes committed.

You (or here, BadEmpanada) don’t need to lie about the Nazis to make that comparison.

Because it was a good rhetorical strategy to gain power?

Does it matter that their first acts once they gained power was to kill actual socialists and communists?

Does it matter that working conditions worsened for German people even before the first shots of WW2 were fired, as they ramped up productions to prepare the war machine?

I’m sorry, it’s just historically inaccurate to describe the actions of the Nazi party as even potentially beneficial to the German people.

We see this in fascist movements today as well. Even under “white supremacy” there’s no advocacy for anything that would actually benefit white people, it’s just grievance politics against out groups.

Even this framing sanewashes the Nazis.

The actual Nazi party delivered none of this while gutting government services and selling services (like the post office) off to the lowest bidder.

The term “privatization” was coined in order to describe what the Nazis were doing in Germany

That tracks

Ok. Offering benefit of doubt that it might mean sister was stupid. My point is that it’s a fucking weird way to say “sister-in-law” and leaves me suspicious that the framing of the article is dishonest at best.

Her sister or sister in law?

How does including “lootbox free” harm the player experience? Unless you mean that’s what the lootbox is doing?

You just did?

It’s now after the meeting, go watch the press conference and tell me trump isn’t absolutely smitten with Mamdani.

There’s no way they get critical support for this, but it’s important to use the bully pulpit to get people on board

Yeah, fair enough; seems we’re saying the same thing then. I really got the impression from the initial comment that only uniquely smart things would use tactics. I can see how that might have been meant more broadly

Wolves have an intelligence of 3, few beasts “more mindless” would be aggressive enough to face tank the party.

I guess all I’m really saying is that there really isn’t that much in the game that should stand and deliver against the closest enemy until it dies

A mindless beast, like a wolf that’s known for stalking it’s prey and going for a weak one to pull it away from it’s group?

Yeah, that’s fair. The mouth description probably seals it for me. I think it’d be more useful to describe the overall “nonplussed” expression than the literal description.

Sure, and yes, it’s literally doing what alt text would do, for the same purpose (i.e. describe the image for the visually impaired). The “style” of these that I’ve seen (not just here) is pretty verbose, so I don’t think that’s necessarily an indication of llm use. Obviously I can’t prove it either way, but I’d rather give these the benefit of the doubt, since this is useful work if it helps people follow along.

Probably not. I think most of these are human volunteers

r/okbuddyvaush is leaking