• 0 Posts
  • 231 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: February 16th, 2025

help-circle


  • Thank you for the break down. I really appreciate the context. I’ll add mine from this end.

    Oreo, though also a cookie full of hydrolized nut-fat and sugar, can be a pejorative term for a black skinned person who does the bidding of white supremacy. This term is usually reserved for those who do it in the less directly violent ways. So think, a black man who only hires white people because that’s what his boss demands, or because he himself is racist towards his own people.

    He would be “black on the outside but white on the inside”. Which is why an Americanized pronunciation of “Orebro” makes me think of the techbro fascists, “Libertarian on the outside but Nazi on the inside”, who also pretended to be one of the working classes.

    I enjoyed this cultural exchange. I think cent-bridge adds more depth to the tongue in cheek usage of Orebro, as tech bros do indeed pretend to build infrastructure, but the infrastructure is cheap and does not serve people well. It is merely a facade to fleece dollars from us. Fucking orebros.




  • Oh, so my limbic system, parts always talking to each other and to other limbic systems, isn’t social enough for you?! My genes, the height of community information transfer, aren’t social enough for you? My nucleic acids being created in the void, as stars, the trees of space, jizz-out matter everywhere and swirl it up in their trillion star sex parties, ain’t social enough for you?!

    We got damn electrons, so horned-up they’re just a smear across probability, screaming to get to a proton, all around us, but there’s nothing social about that either, right?!

    What’s an electron gonna do without social desire? What’s a single hydrogen gonna do by itself? Gravity, the strong force, they only work together. Nothing is even solid without another particle to observe it. Reality, including love, is a social construct.
    We can only do it together.
    It is for us to🤝🏽gather.













  • It’s not sexist to think it looks like a car for people who want a cute, little compact car that lets everyone know they have scratch. That’s just what it looks like.

    “Missy mcmansion” could easily be a young man who wants those things in a car. He will likely embrace the term because he doesn’t think women and their associated descriptors are inherently “less than”. This looks looks like a car for a cute purse, a blowout, and a manicure.

    I didn’t use “missy” to denigrate. I used it as marker for lifestyle choices regardless of sex or gender. You certainly picked up on my dripping distaste, but it’s because I think the car looks silly, just like the SUV, and neither fit my lifestyle choices. When I think the big matcho SUV is dumb, am I being sexist?

    If it makes you feel any better, I always loved the Miata, because it looks like she’s got skin under her nails, cute but not to be played with lightly, and that fits my aesthetic just fine.

    Edit: lol, you’re mad because I said “bottom energy” and you thought “woman energy” and had to put your misogynistic thoughts on me to make yourself feel better after I explained it 😝