she/her

  • 5 Posts
  • 33 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2023

help-circle
  • That’s how it starts, but it ends in the same hell. Once you decide your country stands for something, you inevitably stop seeing how it has failed at doing that thing for centuries.

    This is a non-sequitur. There’s nothing stopping someone from seeing what a country stands for and how it has failed to live up to those ideals. People can in fact walk and talk.

    …So when people talk about freedom and equality as a U.S. value, when they talk about the melting point, they have to pretend the slaves don’t exist.

    No one has to ignore our history or pretend the prison industrial complex doesn’t exist to understand that we stood for equality. In fact, it’s the other way around. It’s the people who ignore and even rewrite our history who fail to understand America is a melting pot.

    Another way of looking at it is, “You might say your country stands for this ideal, but when we find massive examples of it failing, then you’re arguing with reality. You might wish your country stood for it, but it doesn’t, at least not now. Quit lying to yourself.”

    Except there are massive examples of it succeeding. The US ended slavery and gave voting rights to women. So it is your argument arguing with reality.

    When we lose sight of the fact our country stood for something we end up in a nationalist christo-fascist dictatorship. Championing freedom and justice for all is how we stave off the division employed by fascists.

    Pretending the US didn’t stand for anything is an agreement with the fascists. They believe America has always been a white christian nation state and now it is one. Your argument is agreeing with their lie. The only way to defeat the fascists is to believe in the truth.





  • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldStill Don't Sleep Though
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Yep. I don’t understand this fetish for decorum.

    With Obama I posit he had to overcome racism and Bill Clinton cheating on Hillary Clinton.

    Quit running defense for a Party that was already staging Genocide before Joe was in charge:

    I’m arguing for the most useful strategy during elections. Which you did by voting for Harris. Other people on here are still arguing against this.

    No one has to like the Democrats. They’re our most useful tool until some socialist or progressive co-opts the Democratic party. edit: typo





  • Sure. Though we can’t quite know if even that’s true as she did not become president.

    I’m not sure what you’re referring to. We cannot look into an alternate timeline.

    Former presidents do not have power over current presidents.

    We can look at her public statements. And those compared to this make it clear Biden was definitely worse

    https://jewishcurrents.org/joe-bidens-alarming-record-on-israel

    At this crucial juncture, Biden undercut Obama again. After Clinton’s ultimatum, the vice president—who was still traveling in the Middle East—contacted Netanyahu himself. In their book Our Separate Ways: The Struggle for the Future of the U.S.-Israel Alliance, Dana Allin and Steve Simon describe Biden’s discussion with the Israeli prime minister as “a conciliatory call” that had the effect of “undercutting Clinton and reinforcing Israel’s generally dismissive approach to the administration’s periodically tough messaging.” An administration official remembers being “astonished” upon seeing the transcript of the conversation: “Biden completely undercut the secretary of state and gave Bibi a strong indication that whatever was being planned in Washington was hotheadedness and he could defuse it when he got back.” When Clinton saw the transcript, the official recalls, she “realized she’d been thrown under the bus.”

    Biden’s been derailing US foreign policy on the Israel since he was vp.

    Was still pretty much the biggest self-sabotaging way of communicating that sentiment in the campaign.

    Yes.



  • Harris’ refusal to break from Biden on the campaign trail and the DNC consultants sunk her campaign into the ground.

    Harris would have plenty of room to break from Biden once he was out of the White House.

    This is what I mean when I say Biden was a life long Zionist. He was actively sabotaging US foreign policy since he was VP.

    https://jewishcurrents.org/joe-bidens-alarming-record-on-israel

    At this crucial juncture, Biden undercut Obama again. After Clinton’s ultimatum, the vice president—who was still traveling in the Middle East—contacted Netanyahu himself. In their book Our Separate Ways: The Struggle for the Future of the U.S.-Israel Alliance, Dana Allin and Steve Simon describe Biden’s discussion with the Israeli prime minister as “a conciliatory call” that had the effect of “undercutting Clinton and reinforcing Israel’s generally dismissive approach to the administration’s periodically tough messaging.” An administration official remembers being “astonished” upon seeing the transcript of the conversation: “Biden completely undercut the secretary of state and gave Bibi a strong indication that whatever was being planned in Washington was hotheadedness and he could defuse it when he got back.” When Clinton saw the transcript, the official recalls, she “realized she’d been thrown under the bus.”

    This is not the same as supporting a two-state solution.


  • What does any of this have to do with the Democrats being the correct choice in 2024 and being the correct choice in the next two elections if we have them?

    There are still people advocating for not voting after it is now clear that was the wrong choice.

    (Voted for her too, btw, I’m mad her rhetoric didn’t let me bring friends)

    If that’s not you then you shouldn’t have a problem with this.

    And if we don’t?

    Then voting wont be an option.

    We’ve had real primaries since 2008.



  • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldStill Don't Sleep Though
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    The people who fed these talking points to Americans were Russian bot farms. Harris is not a life long Zionist. Biden is.

    Biden had single-handedly been undermining US foreign policy since he was vice president. He undercut the US position in a private call with Benjamin Netanyahu when the US was trying to leverage Israel into behaving. edit: typo

    https://jewishcurrents.org/joe-bidens-alarming-record-on-israel

    At this crucial juncture, Biden undercut Obama again. After Clinton’s ultimatum, the vice president—who was still traveling in the Middle East—contacted Netanyahu himself. In their book Our Separate Ways: The Struggle for the Future of the U.S.-Israel Alliance, Dana Allin and Steve Simon describe Biden’s discussion with the Israeli prime minister as “a conciliatory call” that had the effect of “undercutting Clinton and reinforcing Israel’s generally dismissive approach to the administration’s periodically tough messaging.” An administration official remembers being “astonished” upon seeing the transcript of the conversation: “Biden completely undercut the secretary of state and gave Bibi a strong indication that whatever was being planned in Washington was hotheadedness and he could defuse it when he got back.” When Clinton saw the transcript, the official recalls, she “realized she’d been thrown under the bus.”







  • No it was people who didn’t want to vote for Kamala Harris. Everyone who doesn’t work at the DNC needs to learn that lesson. Everyone who works at the DNC has a different set of lessons to learn. Like be a socialist and abandon neoliberalism.

    The fact that we had a choice of someone other than Biden was incredible from a political standpoint. It’s laughable more people weren’t jumping at the chance to elect the candidate who wasn’t a lifelong, diehard Zionist.