Formerly /u/Zagorath on the alien site.

  • 113 Posts
  • 1.04K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle
  • Zagorath@aussie.zonetoGaming@lemmy.worldThe convert
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    and dint like it because u didnt read the culture tree

    That is…more than a little bit reductive.

    The game is also downloadable the normal way not just as torrent

    Oh cool! Glad to see! 8 months ago either it wasn’t an option, or it wasn’t presented very prominently.

    The “sexism” thing has been fixed, pesants now have random gender

    That’s ok, but like I said in that thread, the problem isn’t really the sexism (that was just an added factor), it was the game design that came with that. The unintuitive way some military units can also do eco work, but some can’t, and there’s no simple or intuitive way to know which is which.

    And as much as I liked the idea of having a trade-off that you have to decide how many and when to send citizen-soldiers to battle vs when to hang back on eco didn’t feel good. Maybe with more experience that gets better? But first impressions matter, and it definitely doesn’t feel as good as Age.




  • Zagorath@aussie.zonetoGaming@lemmy.worldThe convert
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    0AD is so much better than AoE

    It really, really isn’t. It’s really quite terrible in comparison. I was actually quite saddened, because I first played it like 15 years ago, but then replayed it late last year and was excited to see how much it had progressed, but it still really felt like the early alpha game of my memory.




  • Zagorath@aussie.zonetoGaming@lemmy.worldThe convert
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    Transcription:

    3 panels. 1: the Stephen Crowder “change my mind” meme: Age of Empires is shit, change my mind. 2: a red monk from Aoe says “Wololo”. 3: the Stephen Crowder meme edited to show him wearing red and the sign saying “I love Age of Empires ❤️❤️❤️❤️”





  • Zagorath@aussie.zonetoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 days ago

    I worry about this sometimes. I don’t ever want to be seen as speaking “for” minorities I’m not a member of, but I do want to be seen speaking “up for” them. And I worry about finding the right balance. I don’t want to speak over them, but do want to help make it clear that I support them and I am opposed to those who are opposed to them. I don’t want to be MLK’s “white moderate”.








  • Actually something just occurred to me. Because my system, unlike the one from the Stack Exchange link or the one described elsewhere in the thread using an ID card, relies on a per-site untraceable request to the government, the government would be able to detect if one user is making a suspicious number of requests. It’s reasonable for one person to make tens of requests, maybe even low hundreds over the course of a lifetime. It’s not reasonable to be making hundreds or more in a day. They wouldn’t know which sites are being accessed with it, or even what accounts on those sites. But they could set rate limits to prevent one person creating too many accounts for others, and potentially threaten legal action against them for doing so.

    That threat of legal action is part of the same thing that prevents children from being able to go up to a random adult, handing them a $50 note, and asking for $20 worth of alcohol in exchange. You’re not going to be able to prevent it on a smaller scale, but you can definitely prevent a small handful of people being able to age verify on behalf of thousands of children.

    An additional protection could be added depending on how the age verification works. If she verification is “upload a scan of your photo ID”, then yeah, mass verification becomes possible. But if each verification requires you to hold up your photo ID next to your face, speak a specific phrase aloud (with automated lip reading attempting a rough lip flap match), nod your head, write a specific phrase on a piece of paper, and more, all in randomised orders, it becomes a much bigger burden for someone to provide for others.

    I’m certainly not advocating this. The level of burden for legitimate users would be too high to consider it reasonable. But it would be possible. Something like this has been used in the past for things like EV code signing certificates, where a larger burden is relatively more reasonable.




  • It would also reveal to the government that the user was accessing 18+ content

    Yes, I did mention that. Although ironically, Australia’s social media minimum age law, and other similar laws being considered around the world, would actually increase privacy in this respect. The government could have separate keys for each age of legal significance (16 and 18, in Australia) and sign with the appropriate one (either the highest the user meets, or all the user meets—the latter would give the site less information about the user’s and).

    I don’t believe it is technically possible to get around the example you shared there. Even in the real world, it’s not dissimilar to a child asking an adult to buy alcohol for them.