I find the pouches really easy to quit cold turkey, so there’s not really a need to ween off once you’ve switched to them. It does suck for the first day not using them, but by day 3 I’ve completely forgotten they exist. Totally different experience quitting pouches vs a vape.

I’ve quit and picked up the habit several times, mainly because they’re so easy to quit that I don’t see a huge harm in using. I wouldn’t touch a vape again because it was such an effort and pain to quit.

Also nicotine isn’t a carcinogen (tobacco is), and nicotine pouches are not linked to any cancer risk.

Nicotine products in general have been linked to reproductive harms such as stillbirth, premature birth, and low birth weight. Conversely, non-tobacco-based nicotine pouches (also known as “nic pouches”) are classified as non-carcinogenic since nicotine itself is not a carcinogen. However, they are still harmful to cardiovascular health due to their nicotine content, and are associated with moderately higher risk of cardiovascular disease, stroke, and reproductive harms.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snus

Nicotine itself is currently classified as non-carcinogenic according to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, and according to the Royal College of Physicians nicotine in itself is not a hazardous drug. In turn, it is hypothesized that if nicotine can be delivered without tobacco and smoke inhalation, most, if not all of the harm of smoking can be avoided. However, if not carcinogenic, nicotine is still moderately harmful to cardiovascular health, therefore long-term use of non-tobacco nicotine pouches very likely causes higher risks for cardiovascular diseases, stroke, and reproductive harms.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicotine_pouch

Nicotine is as harmful as caffeine and marginally more addictive.

How would one “leak” “fake information”, exactly?

You know they’re shitting themselves. Progressive successes pose more of a threat to incumbent Democrats than Republican successes

Lol

One side has all of the power and uses it to make elections illegal 🤷

Israel has not allowed any elections in Gaza since 2006* FTFY

No bites? ☹️ Aw!

😴 lol report me then

😴 you tried. People aren’t that stupid lol and your bad-faith argument is easily spotted a mile away

it seems too flimsy

Okay, then the cops will have no problem proving you were elsewhere at the time, if its a lie. Until they’ve proved it and convinced a jury of that, you’re 100% innocent.

Seriously, it’s not your concern as a defendent to prove your innocence. If they can’t prove you’re lying about such a flimsy alibi, then what kind of case could they possibly have against you anyway?

You attempted to troll. You received a minor amount of downvotes and backlash. 🤷 If you don’t like that people on Lemmy are reasonable, you can just stop using Lemmy.

Lmao

The commenter is still completely wrong, then. In that case there is no due process and you’re just guilty because people with guns say so.

Wrong, that’s the opposite of how reasonable doubt works. It is the prosecutor’s job to prove beyond doubt that the defendent is guilty of the charges. The defendent does not need to prove they are innocent.

If the prosecutor can’t prove that the defendent is lying about the alibi, then they’ve failed at their job.