• Maki@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    3·
    38 minutes ago

    Oh, look who joined my block list just now. If you guessed OP, then give yourself a pat on the back.

  • Lumidaub@feddit.org
    5·
    1 hour ago

    Man, I thought it was simply because it was about your creative work but apparently you’re incapable of taking any kind of criticism in general.

  • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
    16·
    4 hours ago

    I mean, how hard is it to figure out that Trump is putting immigrants in cages and separating them from their kids and families. The fact that Kamala Harris it’s not planning to do that should be reason enough to give her the benefit of the doubt if you’re not a fascist cunt.

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    9·
    5 hours ago

    That election was two years ago.

    I don’t agree with everything, not even most things, said by the kinds of “social justice” types of people you are trying to parody in this.

    But in the world we currently live in, there are way worse problems to focus on than that. In a world where governments around the world are openly trying to exclude young people from communicating freely on the Internet, and in many others increasing their control over it too, talking about people yelling at other people for not being “woke” enough sounds like a complete distraction.

    Also I see that this community has a “no politics” rule, so I’m going to report this for violating that.

  • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
    171·
    6 hours ago

    Sudden abscorbic rejection is the tolerant reaction to facist sea-lioning.

    There are a handful of other issues where a similarly strong rejection is appropriate, such as “surely a little rape is OK” or “why can’t a grandfather fuck a 12 year old”.

    It may seem extreme to respond with such vitriol just to a political choice, until you remember that the politocian in question is a rapist and a pedophile.

      • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
        4·
        2 hours ago

        Trolling or harassing in the “I’m just trying to have a debate”-kind of way, making the most absurd, enraging and usually false arguments while maintaining a civil appearance.
        The best metaphor I came across would be a DDoS-attack on a human’s topic focus.

        Example: when a comment section discusses what could be done so the Mediterranean became less deadly to refugees, a sea lion could stir shit by asking whether it was “really necessary to not have so many people drowning because refugees are raping, stealing and just straining european social security systems anyway? Just asking questions though.”

        Or a sea lion could force you into a debate you never wanted. You make a simple statement most people already agree on that doesn’t need much explanation, like “Yeah, fascism is bad, we shouldn’t vote for fascist candidates and parties”, then a sea lion would start to ask you why fascism is bad, what’s so fascist about candidate A, etc, even under other comments you posted stating they were just trying to have a debate, implying you’re dodging them because you had no argument and made everything up.

  • macniel@feddit.org
    4·
    5 hours ago

    And then everybody clapped because the child was Einstein?

    The thing about elections in USA is: you only have limited options, so it really wouldn’t take long to research those options (and in the case of DJT just remembering his first term would suffice) but if you can’t even do that, just invalidate your vote then and do better next time.

    • Coolans Planet@lemmy.todayOP
      110·
      4 hours ago

      Nope, you don’t have limited options, unless the only tool you are willing to use to fix the US is vote. But American Revolution wasn’t voted, and many important changes in the history wasn’t voted either. You have endless options.

          • macniel@feddit.org
            3·
            3 hours ago

            Except no? Revolution isn’t the option of an election between few or two choices. You’ve lost your own plot. Kudos.

            • Coolans Planet@lemmy.todayOP
              14·
              2 hours ago

              I think you are the one who “lost the plot”, since you’ve changed the subject and your answer doesn’t have anything to do with anything we’ve been talking in this thread or my meme. Besides, discussions are not for winning or losing, that’s for low IQ people like yourself. Discussions are meant either to reach the truth or for having a good time with a healthy ideas exchange.

  • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
    41·
    6 hours ago

    Not that it would go better for you, nor should it, but, this is definitely more a shitpost type thing than a meme type thing.

  • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@anarchist.nexusEnglish
    15·
    3 hours ago

    Good, you deserve to be even more uncomfortable, make right-wingers and centrists afraid again, hopefully until you stop being a right-winger or centrist. Death to AmeriKKKa, all its Presidents, and any losers who ran for the office of President but failed.

    • Coolans Planet@lemmy.todayOP
      16·
      3 hours ago

      I’m not uncomfortable at all, kid. But you are right in one thing: everyone who wants to run for president is a loser. Winners don’t need to rule other people’s life.