rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · hace 18 díasThey don't like the rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square149linkfedilinkarrow-up1513arrow-down187
arrow-up1426arrow-down1imageThey don't like the rulelemmy.blahaj.zonerockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · hace 18 díasmessage-square149linkfedilink
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down7·hace 18 díasturns out, humans can be informed. and ethics are about how we treat other people.
minus-squareHagdos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·hace 4 díasThat’s why my remark about young kids. You can’t inform a 2-year old. I don’t see why ethics should be limited to humans only.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·hace 4 días I don’t see why ethics should be limited to humans only. because that’s exactly what ethics dictate: how humans treat each other. it’s a speciesist enterprise.
minus-squareSuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·hace 17 días other people I notice you didn’t say “other humans” there. I think that speaks for itself.
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·hace 17 díasit says what it means. bad faith interpretations don’t change it.
turns out, humans can be informed. and ethics are about how we treat other people.
That’s why my remark about young kids. You can’t inform a 2-year old.
I don’t see why ethics should be limited to humans only.
because that’s exactly what ethics dictate: how humans treat each other. it’s a speciesist enterprise.
I notice you didn’t say “other humans” there. I think that speaks for itself.
it says what it means. bad faith interpretations don’t change it.