• Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Absolutely OK. If “something something X” is the name of your product, it needs to contain X to a certain degree. If there was no strawberry in strawberry jam, you would complain. If there was no cinnamon in a cinnamon bun, this would be wrong, too.

    The term “Vegan Chicken Chips” for a product that does not contain chicken is simply like “Apple Sauce” without apples.

    • stay_on_target@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Rocky mountain oysters contain no oysters. Head cheese is not cheese. Hen of the woods is not a bird. Welsh rabbit includes 0% rabbit. Ants on a log, Cowboy caviar, Bear claws… refried beans are… gasp… only fried once.

      Its all made up and the points don’t matter, until you start threatening profits.

    • rnercle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      the problem is that they’re banning words like “steak” which isn’t about ingredients

      The word steak was written steke in Middle English, and comes from the mid-15th century Scandinavian word steik, related to the Old Norse steikja ‘to roast on a stake’, and so is related to the word stick or stake.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        The point here is that nobody really cares for middle English name origins. Ask 100 random people what “steak” is, and I’d be surprized if you did not get at least 99 answers that it’s meat.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      What about bacon chips that contain no bacon?

      Or that’s alright because it’s bacon spices?

      Lmao people are stupid.