• acockworkorange@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    He said he armed himself with a gun that he manufactured with a 3D printer and affixed with a silencer.

    “I shot Mr. Thompson and he died,” Mangione said. “I understood that my actions would place him in fear of death or bodily injury. I knew what I was doing was illegal.”

    This is so extremely convenient to the establishment, it raises suspicion.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    Other executives from UnitedHealthcare, seated two rows behind the family, struggled to look at Mangione. Several put their hands on their faces, shaking their heads slowly in disbelief.

    All we did was condemn millions to pain, suffering and death to maximize shareholder value and pur own bonuses and then a monster like this just comes by and kills us? Unbelievable

  • k0e3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    He was shooting hoops with me, not CEOs. That was probably some other hero.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I saw the video and was clearly the same fucker in the photo of the Flock camera vandal.

    (shaking fist) Benjamin Netanyahuuuuuu!

  • jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    107
    ·
    2 days ago

    Really was hoping for a jury nullification. I don’t care if he did it. I don’t care who did it. People knowingly making massive profits on misery and cruelty don’t deserve peaceful lives.

    • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I said if I made president he’d be pardoned. I’m not messing. I’m thinking of running, and the more I think, the more I want to fix the system for us little guys. I’ll probably “Epstein” myself or fall out of a highrise window, but I’m thinking that’s a risk I’ll have to take.

        • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          75
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Well I checked the law and there’s no exception for monster hunters. It turns out that if you plan and execute a homicide, you’re a criminal, even if you kill a monster. WHO KNEW???

          The only morally self-consistent way to approach this is as civil disobedience. You gotta take the punishment or you’re not an activist, you’re just another monster.

          • curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            45
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            What is legal is not always right, and what is right is not always legal - paraphrased from Algernon Sidley, late 1600s.

            Full Quote

            That which is not just, is not Law; and that which is not Law, ought not to be obeyed.

            … the directive power of the law, which is certain, and grounded upon the inherent good and rectitude that is in it, is that alone which has a power over the conscience, whereas the coercive is merely contingent; and the most just powers commanding the most just things, have so often fallen under the violence of the most unjust men, commanding the most execrable villainies, that if they were therefore to be obeyed, the consciences of men must be regulated by the success of a battle or conspiracy, than which nothing can be affirmed more impious and absurd….

            If this were so, the governments of the world might be justly called magna latrocinia; and men laying aside all considerations of reason or justice, ought only to follow those who can inflict the greatest punishments, or give the greatest rewards. But since the reception of such opinions would be the extirpation of all that can be called good, we must look for another rule of our obedience, and shall find that to be the law, which being, as I said before, sanctio recta, must be founded upon that eternal principle of reason and truth, from whence the rule of justice which is sacred and pure ought to be deduced, and not from the depraved will of man, which fluctuating according to the different interests, humors and passions that at several times reign in several nations, one day abrogates what had been enacted the other. The sanction therefore that deserves the name of a law, which derives not its excellency from antiquity, or from the dignity of the legislators, but from an intrinsick equity and justice, ought to be made in pursuance of that universal reason to which all nations at all times owe an equal veneration and obedience.

            A few examples for you (aside from the blatantly obvious and well known like slavery)

            • Jim Crow Laws
            • The Bloody Code (1700s England)
            • French salt tax
            • Vagrancy laws (still exist, and are nowhere near right)
            • Anti-LGBTQ laws - some are historic, some are current
            • Magdalene Laundries
            • the Combination Acts
            • Forced Assimilation laws
            • Window Tax
            • Debt Slavery
            • Three Strike laws
            • Civil asset forfeiture
            • Joint Enterprise laws
            • Extended detention without charge
            • Public protest bans
            • Tied visa systems
            • Sub-minimum wage exemptions

            The list goes on and on and on. Many of which are still legal today, or have been reworked for the same effect and are in effect today.

            Being “legal” or “illegal” is a distinction without merit.

            • Unless you expect “murder” to become legal soon I don’t feel like this is a very strong argument.

              I understand why Luigi did it and the CEO was a piece of shit, but I’m not sure legalizing the execution of these dickheads in the streets is the best answer here. I’d rather see laws outlawing what that CEO did.

              • curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                22 hours ago

                I don’t believe I said anything of the sort.

                I said legality is a distinction without merit. It is a completely irrelevant element unless you are discussing the morality of a law.

          • Mistakes@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            2 days ago

            He’s doing civil disobedience by your definition. Literally pleading guilty. In the hypothetical where he receives a pardon, nothing has changed in that regard.

  • slaacaa@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    3 days ago

    “I shot Mr. Thompson and he died,” Mangione said. “I understood that my actions would place him in fear of death or bodily injury. I knew what I was doing was illegal.”