• FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      23 hours ago

      You wonder? Fox is owned by Rupert Murdoch, one of the richest men on earth, who literally owns every other newspaper in australia, and a good chunk of the british press as well.

      • neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        23 hours ago

        sure, but he’ll liquidate Fox News to get rid of the suits if it comes down to it, and just drop another ultra right wing nazi propaganda media in its place the next day.

    • digital_man@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 days ago

      Agreed, I also like this strategy as it keeps it out the federal courts. Trump wants small government with corporations taking over it’s roles. Fine then we can tank and destroy those companies ( or at least try too)

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Fox will just redact it and make him make the apology. It won’t be sincere, but I assume it gives credence to the case as well if they refuse.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Yeah but I doubt Dominion said we will drop the suit if you have the anchor apologize and redact the comments.

          Dominion was likely hurt business wise as they went from making the voting systems for the largest economy on earth to being believed to be a part of a fraud scheme they didnt participate in, which likely loses them future profits

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Retract his statements and redact everywhere they put it in text I imagine.

          He would need to apologize for defaming someone. It’s part of the terms made by his lawyers for them to drop the suit without it going anywhere further from what the article said.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            Redactions are not how news media works. Just admit to using the wrong word.

            And just so we’re clear, you’re saying this article claims Newsom will have to apologize… For being defamed?

            • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Read the article if it wasn’t clear to you whom I was talking about. It should be very clear. I’m sorry I used a term meaning to remove or edit text from a previously created document which is standardly done for legal purposes.

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                2 days ago

                I didn’t read the article. Context matters, just using pronouns without context or knowing others share yours will cause miscommunications. As will misusing terms.

                • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  The onus is on you to read the article if you are commenting about it. It’s like showing up to a book club and asking who, when someone said “I can’t believe he stole the car!”

                • AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  “I didn’t read the article.”

                  Okay then read it or don’t participate in conversations that you’re walking blind into? What the fuck lol

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Fox News spent a very large sum of money a long time ago to be classified as entertainment. I doubt they will need to spend anything now to get away with it.

    • Cocopanda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      They would just form a new corporation. Transfer the assets to the new entity and then bankrupt News Corp. just like the Sacklers. Or how ever Purdue Pharma’s CEO’s spell their name.

  • LupusBlackfur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The suit alleges that Fox News was motivated to “lie and distort on behalf of the President

    Isn’t that the Murdoch entire business model/plan/reason for existing…??? 🤡 💩

  • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    Go fuck yourself with a cactus Newsom. Snakes like you can’t be allowed to pivot back to “owning conservatives” after sucking up to fascist youth groups. The only story here is that Newsom wants to get back into the good graces of liberals.

        • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          He isn’t fighting shit. This is an absolutely performative stunt to earn brownie points from “the libs.” He’s a cynical asshole who will do nothing but help the owning class while pretending he’ll help your side.

          I have more genuine hatred for corprocrats like him than any of the fascists because they do nothing but sell false solutions. Instead of doing something useful, they’re still playing politics. The fascists are evil incarnate, but they exist because of spineless neoliberal who are allergic to social democracy. By killing any real solution to people’s problems, they make fascist change the only alternative to the status quo.

          They just want us the beg for that fucked status quo back because at least people aren’t being sent to death camps. I want every single one of them to burn.

          • Soulg@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I really don’t know why it’s so hard to accept that someone you hate can be doing the right thing from time to time

            • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              This is pure theater, so why should I give it cudos? At most he’ll get a settlement that’ll go into his pockets, while it’s more likely than not to go nowhere.