• edgemaster72@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    19 days ago

    Is the top right panel supposed to be assuming it was 2 players in separate engagements, then bottom left you’re supposed to be finding out teammates got engaged to each other? I just assumed that was the case from the initial “headline” in top left. Not sure what the purpose of top right panel would be otherwise.

    • Arcanepotato@crazypeople.onlineOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 days ago

      Yes. The thought process was:

      Why is there a news article about hockey players getting engaged? Did they happen to do it on the same day or something? Was it a team effort?

      Oh wait, the charge is the PWHL. Is this some weird sexist thing, focusing on women’s players marriages?

      (Click)

      Oh, that’s cute 🥰

      • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        So it’s surprising that good news was, in fact, good news? Not trying to disparage or anything, just trying to understand the choice of meme format and the message being conveyed.

        • Arcanepotato@crazypeople.onlineOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 days ago

          just trying to understand the choice of meme format and the message being conveyed.

          That’s a lot more than low effort, comrade 🤭

          So it’s surprising that good news was, in fact, good news?

          Close, I think? I was doom scrolling and pessimistic about why this was newsworthy but it turned out just being cute. Two players on the same team getting engaged to different people is still joyous, but that story doesn’t come with the implied story of people achieving excellence together with their life partner.

  • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 days ago

    Makes me wonder, are women’s pro sports leagues just that much more progressive, or do people just not give a fuck about lesbians? Seems like it’s much easier for women living a progressive lifestyle to fly under the radar (or rather AFAB people, considering that people don’t really seem to care about trans men either), most of the public hate seems lazer focused on AMAB people.

    • southsamurai@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 days ago

      Generally, yeah, lesbians only get the standard misogyny plus a small extra gay percentage of hate for being lesbians.

      Gay men get the extra extra hate because.

      It’s all misogyny in a different form tbh

    • Arcanepotato@crazypeople.onlineOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      Seems like it’s much easier for women living a progressive lifestyle to fly under the radar

      I’m sure you didn’t mean anything like this but I really want to push back on the idea of not being in a cishet monogamous pairing as being a “progressive lifestyle”.

      I haven’t looked into it or anything but I know when players were interviewed on the radio at least one mentioned their wife when talking about moving to Ottawa for the team. That person was already married and therefore are not these two people, so yes there are more than two players on the Ottawa PWHL team who are women who love women.

      I didn’t want to mention Heated Rivalry because I’m not their target audience so it’s okay if I don’t get it, but it seemed like a really odd choice when women’s sports are gay as hell (which rules) whether it’s public knowledge or not.