• trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Do not do this. Helium is a scarce resource and those balloons create pollution and kill animals when they come down.

  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The gun is going to come down somewhere. Gravity is a bitch like that. So, coastline, and make sure the winds are out to sea. Not just the surface winds, but also the winds aloft. When the gun does eventually come down, it is still going to be connected to the balloons, and will be floating at the surface for days. A balloon mass this large could attract attention. You’ll want some kind of water soluble string to drop the gun and ensure it sinks.

    As it ascends, the balloon cluster is going to show up on doorbell cameras. The noise of the gunshot is going to draw witnesses with phone cameras. At the very least, you need a moonless night. Fog bank and low ceilings can help. Definitely don’t want to try this during the day.

  • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Unless you pay cash for the balloons and somehow get helium from somewhere without a bottle deposit there will be a paper trail for the setup.

  • Apeman42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    5 hours ago

    >buy Helium

    >around 10,000 balloon

    >gun

    >attach balloons filled with helium to self

    >shoot yourself

    >let the corpse fly away

    >no one will ever know

    Thank me later

  • Emi@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I think they can tell it was self inflicted gunshot but yeah, the missing gun will be a mystery.

  • nomad@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 hours ago

    There is an episode in the show Elementary that tells a similar story. Person shoots self on bridge, gun connected to weight and wire and falls into river. Mystery “created”.

  • ladicius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    When the gun is coming down and found and being handed over to police they may find out that the ballistic signature of gun and bullet match.

    Thank them later.

    • nomad@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Apparently matching guns to bullets is mostly pseudoscience. They can match caliber and firearm type quite reliably but that’s about it.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The big problem is that bullets are soft. When they hit anything solid (like bone) they deform. Bullet matching is fine when the bullet is undamaged, but that generally isn’t the case, unless it missed and hit something soft and non-ablatative.

        Trying to match damaged bullets is very unreliable.

          • cynar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Apparently CSI had lawyers on both sides cursing it 20+ years ago (when I did a uni module on forensics). Juries expected concise, absolute results. Instead they get probabilities, maybes, and shades of grey.

            I dread to think what it is like now.