Donald Trump’s new security directive labels anti-capitalist beliefs as a predictor of political violence. The irony: left-wing structural analysis actually pushes people away from lone-wolf attacks and toward mass organizing for change.

  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    That’s funny because Trump isn’t a capitalist. In an open market, his businesses fail. He needs government interferencey China style.

    • Deme@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      33 seconds ago

      That’s a very narrow definition of capitalism. If free markets hinder the main function of the capitalist system (accumulating capital at the top), it will be eroded and abolished. Monopolies for example are much more profitable than competetive situations. Getting rid of or circumventing open market competition is always good business.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Are we starting to use the word “capitalist” the way the Nazis or Soviets used the word “socialist?” As a meaningless label for “the dictator’s side?”

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    “support for the overthrow of the United States Government,” is also one pre-crime per that report. That’s reflection right there.

    So Marx and Trotsky seemed to be against individual murdering of factory owners et alia. Does that imply that they would’ve been against the atrocities of Communist states that were perpetrated in their name, or would that have been fine because it was done by the masses in some sense?

    Neither saw it happen in great numbers: Marx died before any of his ideas manifested properly, and Trotsky of course was murdered by Stalin in 1940. Holodomor and Soviet Union purges had happened already at that point, but perhaps Trotsky might’ve thought that those were just the evil of Stalin instead of being a more general mistake of his whole ideology. People tend to think that their political philosophy cannot do bad things.

  • Hellfire103@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Okay, now it’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. With hints of Minority Report, Fahrenheit 451, Brazil, and our old friend Idiocracy, of course.

    • RabiesD@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      This makes me think of the of the right wingers calling themselves deplorable or terrorists in response to being labeled as such.

      Let’s not own up to their labels, let’s reject everything they have to say rather than amplify their messaging.

  • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Since when is there even such a thing as a “political crime”, let alone any kind of “pre-crime”?

    You can’t criminalize someone’s political beliefs, unless you’re talking about making “thought crimes” a thing. And last time I checked “pre-crime” implies you haven’t actually committed any crimes yet…which makes you not actually guilty of anything.

    This whole fucking premise is based on stupidity.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      11 hours ago

      This whole fucking premise is based on stupidity control and power.

      FTFY

      See, if it were based on stupidity, that would imply these measures are based on good faith efforts to solve a real problem.

      What we have here is fabricated issues being “solved” with measures that don’t need to make sense. They just need it to give them more power, more control. It doesn’t matter if they look “stupid”. They aren’t acting in good faith to begin with.

    • Coopr8@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      12 hours ago

      This is the entire goal of Palantir, presictive policing using mass surveillance data on citizens. Tie in digital ID and you have an even worse version of the CCP’s Social Credit system.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    12 hours ago

    “classifies” as a crime?

    What does that even mean?

    He isn’t a lawmaker.

    • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      13 hours ago

      He looks up to Russia. I heard the literally imprisoned half the country because they were such dicks. ( exaggeration, but you get what I mean.)