So I’m assuming that Sinclair will be demanding that Tucker apologize and donate and that the FCC will be threatening to cancel his podcast.

  • HalfSalesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This man doesn’t actually meaningfully believe anything that he says. That said, what he is saying here is true.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    "You hope that a year from now, the turmoil we’re seeing in the aftermath of his murder won’t be leveraged to bring hate speech laws to this country,” Carlson said Wednesday

    Yeah it would really be a shame if free speech were to be trampled at some nebulous point in the future. Imagine if it were to happen now!

    “And trust me, if it is, if that does happen, there is never a more justified moment for civil disobedience than that, ever. And there never will be,” the pundit added.

    The most justified possible cause for civil disobedience in all of human history has been and will only ever be… hate speech laws. Jeez. I’m a white guy and even that level of privilege and arrogance is a little crazy.

    “Because if they can tell you what to say, they’re telling you what to think…There is nothing they can’t do to you because they don’t consider you human.”

    He seems so close to getting it. So damn close. But considering the right’s propensity for projection, it’s probably just an illusion.

  • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It’s something all the right wing grifters will realize at some point.

    These people have no purpose if Trump forces all the news networks in the country to say whatever he wants. He no longer requires any of their services as mouthpieces.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I think Charlie Kirk ironically would be the first one to balk at the supression of leftist rhetoric.

      Without opposition looking to make him look like an asshat while he thinks he’s making them look like an asshat, these pundits lose their ‘edge’. They have nothing to rant against, and without ranting, what’s their draw, how do they make a living being right wing assholes that don’t actually do anything or have to take accountability for anything?

  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Stating the obvious to hoard in people… While still being a fascist himself. Who could have seen this coming…

  • krunklom@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    24 hours ago

    “Finally! I’ve finished my kill-bot. Come, gather round, as I unveil it to the world”

    “But Professor Killington”

    “Yes, adorable, one-legged, orphan Timmy?”

    “Why did you make a kill-bot?”

    “Well, so it would indiscriminately murder anything and everything that moves, of course”

    “But professor, that sounds dangerous”

    “Don’t be a fucking retard Timmy. I know what I’m doing”

    “O-okay Professor”

    “Now everyone gather round as I turn on the killbot for the very first time, and be amazed as it makes me pancakes”

    flips switch

    “OH NO, STOP, STOP, STOP KILLING ME, KILL-BOT OH MY GOD, MY SPLEEN, OH, IF ONLY SOMEBODY COULD HAVE FORRSEEN THIS TERRIBLE TURN OF EVENTS”.

    • SippyCup@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Timmy would go on to run for Congress on an anti killbot policy. He would lose to a bigoted blowhard who insisted on the right for all people to own killbots to make them pancakes.

    • Karjalan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      I was just thinking this is the perfect meme in this context.

      Not only a good point… He dared to go against supreme leader, despite his much he normally licks boots, and when other more moderate people are licking boot about all this

      I’m confused, but happy to see it.

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      88
      ·
      1 day ago

      Tucker is scared because kimmel and other media personalities are getting nuked. That’s his money flow at risk, nothing else.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        1 day ago

        Ya know there a principle I am rather fond of, doing good for bad reasons is still good. While Carlson may be a shitstain undeserving of his kneecaps and while he may be doing a good thing for bad reasons, well I’ll take what I can get. We are effectively shrieking into the void like the banshee outside of my window, nobody hears us but they do hear Carlson.

      • N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Probably, but it’s smart to take allies where you can find them. A lot of right-wingers pay attention to Carlson, and his stance is hitting where left-leaning sources have no pull.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          While his general rhetoric may be aligned, his engagement is driven by people that want validation against those “elite libs” that are saying things they don’t like.

          Without those voices in the room, even if there’s an audience that agrees with his words, that audience doesn’t need him anymare.

        • Hector@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Plus if successful at turning us from our allies based on misplaced motivation, they would just lie about those motivations more to us. Then lie to the other side about our own motivations for stuff we agree with them on.

      • Hector@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        He came out in opposition to the Iranian war and was given Ted Cruz the fuck you treatment calling him a dumbass on it. I think that was before Colbert got fired.

    • Nightlight@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 day ago

      Similar thing for me recently. Learned musk is against collective shouts censorship. Made me really evaluate why I was against it. Still against it. Censorship limits freedom of speech but so does deplatforming the censors. Weird times

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sure, but sometimes the enemy of your enemy is still your enemy. I agree with this one thing that Tucker said. I vehemently disagree with pretty much every single other thing he says, or has said.

        • Nightlight@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah same in my situation basically. Also he wants to harass and censor collective shout. It’s not the right way to address this. ACLU already looking into financial censorship and payment procssors. That’s the way I want it handled. Legally and sanely

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The grammar is ambiguous, FYI, of if you meant the censorship done by collective shout or the censorship being done to collective shout.

        It doesn’t impact my reply, but I figured I’d let you know. :)

        I’m against government censorship in all circumstances outside the cliche “you can’t threaten people or spread injurious falsehoods”.

        I’m okay with private entities not giving people a platform if they aren’t a defacto institution. Credit card companies and financial services should be agnostic to which legal businesses they process payments and hold assets for. Much like how shipping companies are agnostic to what’s in your package, beyond what’s necessary to move it safely.
        If you’re needed for society to function, I want you to blindly service society, even if people I dislike also get service.

        I don’t want to be in a place where every platform needs to accept all participants as valid. There’s plenty of ways to share your viewpoint.

        • Hector@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          That ignores the fact that the government leans on these people behind the scenes. So it is a thinly veiled end run around government censorship, as we have seen with social media, Homeland Security giving lists of names for them to ban for other reasons.

          • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            I wouldn’t say it’s ignoring it. I’m incredulous that DHS would pressure Facebook to cancel an account or something for the same reason I’m not as bothered by it happening: it doesn’t have real consequences.

            If the government censors you, it can take your money or your freedom. Not only does it have much higher stakes, it has stakes you can’t get around. You can’t go to a platform that doesn’t mind and keep going.

            If the government leans on a company, first of all that’s still government censorship and it’s not legal for the government to get a company to do what it cannot. If the specifics of the behavior are legal, it’s still government censorship and wrong (with aforementioned caveats).
            That being said, the consequence of that type of censorship is loss of a social media account. You can find another venue and all they can do is keep asking people to remove the content. If someone refuses or you host overseas, there’s not really anything they can do.

            There’s a benefit to society, in my opinion, for people to reject an idea. Refusing to help someone spread a message is about the most passive way to do that.

            I’ve worked in the webhosting industry. If someone has a Nazi website and they need tech support, you need to ask yourself if you’re willing to take that support request or if you’re letting your manager know you’re not gonna help that message.
            If the employees at a company don’t want to help you and it’s not unjust discrimination, I have a really hard time saying that it’s wrong to tell Nazis to take their website elsewhere.

        • Nightlight@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I agree 100% Sorry I was ambiguous in my last reply. I am against all censorship both by and against collective shout

          I don’t think censoring collective shout helps any of this

          • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            I’m not aware of the specifics of that group to know how I feel.

            My feelings are more born from looking at webhosting and hate/harassment websites. I have a really hard time saying it’s wrong to take down a Nazi website.
            I don’t think the government should be able to, because as abhorrent as it is it’s still a political position and protected. But if the people you’re paying to host your shit don’t want anything to do with you and it’s not unjust discrimination, I don’t think society gains anything by forcing them to keep it up.

            I also don’t think that applies to monopolies, quasi or defacto.

            I think there’s a benefit to telling hateful groups and people they aren’t welcome in civil society. The alternative is to say that there’s no line at which society can tell you to gtfo, and people just need to tolerate you no matter what.
            Shunning or deplatforming is how you do that without violence.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 day ago

      Tucker’s a smart guy with a clever tongue. He can lay out an exhaustive, reasoned, rationalist case for basic civil liberties. And then he can come back a day later to lay out an exhaustive, reasoned, rationalist case against them.

      Just depends on which side of the line he’s standing. Dude’s a talk radio mercenary. He’ll fight for whichever side he thinks will turn him a profit.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Tucker’s a smart guy with a clever tongue.

        No, Tucker Carlson, the guy who tells idiots what they want to hear.

    • Soulg@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 day ago

      He’s honestly been right about very niche things for a while, sometimes for the wrong reasons, and never a good person. But he’s sometimes right

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I’ve noticed this happening more often than I would have imagined, actually. There are some times where Trump or one of his sycophants will make an off-the-cuff remark that is actually, genuinely, a good and logical thing to do. it doesn’t happen that often, but it does happen. The bizarre part is that when that idea fails to manifest media coverage detailing how bad it is, they just… give up on it. It’s like the conservative political philosophy has completely morphed into being a contrarian force against liberalism, in spite of whatever their personal beliefs might be. If democrats are ambivalent on an issue, so are they.

    • Hector@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      22 hours ago

      He was full strength fashy before 2021. He was the one floating a lot of these ideas to see how they play, like locking up your political rivals or news media.

      I suspect that it turned out that Carlson’s mean words towards his superiors at Fox News did him in more than anything. They held grudges after being called dumb fucking cunts or whatever and took the excuse to ask him.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Everyone getting a Russian paycheck is becoming visible right now.

      Trump had a falling-out with Russia, Russia wants the US out of Israel, so you will notice that every single right-wing pundit who is suddenly screaming about government overreach are also the same ones who have been saying that the US shouldn’t get involved in Israel.

      Seriously, it’s like a line-item list. Owens, Shapiro, Carlson, MTG and whatever other assorted midwits who have spoken out against US involvement in the middle-east, same ones who have had the most glowing praise for Russia or Putin.

      Russia wants the middle-east via Iran and they don’t like Trump anymore because he’s too hard to manage and will likely die soon, so the window for shaping policy is rapidly running out.

      (It’s not going to get better when Trump dies.)

      edit: save your insane replies, I don’t care if it hurts your mental health to learn that the world might be more complicated than you think and there is no real binary of “good guys and bad guys” and absolutely everyone is a bad guy.

      • dhhyfddehhfyy4673@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 day ago

        This comment is almost entirely divorced from reality. Just as bad as the nonsense that trumper dipshits spew. Ben fucking Shapiro has spoke out against US involvement in the Middle East? Lol, pretty much his sole life mission is to ensure that that continues. Gtfo with this shit.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      i wonder what your response will be once you learn that marjoree taylor green has tried to stop weapons shipments to isreal, but aoc helped stop her… twice

  • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Interesting. I don’t know who he is, but based on (part of) the Russian shopping video I saw of him yesterday, where he was excited at what everything a Russian supermarket has to offer, finally cumming into his pants after finding that Russia has bread, I wouldn’t expect much.