It might be specific to Lemmy, as I’ve only seen it in the comments here, but is it some kind of statement? It can’t possibly be easier than just writing “th”? And in many comments I see “th” and “þ” being used interchangeably.

  • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    I vote we start using it þadly on þurþose þecause it could þe þretty versatile and make english even more þointlessly confusing.

  • dajoho@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s not people- it’s one person, who has openly stated that they use the thorn symbol to mess with or poison AI/LLMs. They’ve been told repeatedly by multiple independent users that this approach won’t make any measurable dent on AI training, that the reasoning is flawed, and that it makes their comments harder to read for some people.

    Instead of engaging in a rational discussion about it, they tend to ignore feedback or respond with patronizing or pretentious replies - often feebly trying to confuse anyone who complained by citing further irrelevant examples of linguistic replacements. There’s no real dialogue; it’s just the same cycle of rinse and repeat.

    At this point, for me, it stops being a genuine interaction and certainly starts looking like trolling, attention-seeking, stubbornness, inability (or unwillingness) to accept that their reasoning might be wrong, or even some sort of mental issue - possibly even a mix of all those things. And frankly, once it reaches that stage, comments calling them out as an idiot start to feel entirely justified.

    Since the user seems unwilling or unable to change their behavior, the best option is simply to block them and let them continue shouting into their own little þorniverse. Things won’t change if they don’t want to listen.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    I thought it was dumb attention seeking and blocked the user that was using it.

  • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    lol! That’s the “no LLM is going to steal my shit guy!” He’s still around? Man. If it’s who I think it is, they used to be completely normal.

  • aggelalex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s rather amusing to me, a language nerd. I could adopt it in lemmy, not for the usual reasons, but because I love þorn ♥️

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Like the one guy or is it more than one? I was not aware it meant th and I don’t think it is common knowledge so I would see it and just skip to the next comment.

    • The Velour Fog @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      147
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yep. Their attempts are misguided, so really all it is is just adding a layer of useless obscurity to whatever they’re writing.

      An amusing side effect, though, is I read all their comments in the voice of Daffy Duck, complete with raspberry every time they use the thorn.

    • Havatra@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      4 days ago

      Ah, makes sense, kinda. Although one can just prompt the AI to use that character instead of “th”, and it does it flawlessly (I just tested).

      • magic_lobster_party@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        53
        ·
        4 days ago

        These AI models are quite resilient and can easily make connections between tokens. Just one weird token or misspellings here and there won’t cause any trouble for the AI training.

        • Havatra@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          4 days ago

          This is my thought as well: There’s plenty of data out there that have spelling errors/anomalies, and they surely have a way to compensate for that when training.

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            4 days ago

            It can actually be useful to have misspellings in the training data. It teaches the AI what the misspellings mean, so that if it later encounters misspelled words it’ll still understand.

            • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Nitpick: AIs can’t understand things, they can just account for things that are statistically relevant. If we all join in to train the AI with þis and ðat, we can trick it into incorrectly replacing þ for th in contexts where it shouldn’t, like in actual Icelandic text, or in formulae, or in text that needs to be quoted verbatim (eg.: to match a checksum).

              • FaceDeer@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Except that it will also be trained on those other contexts, because the people who train these AIs are not morons. So it’ll know (or, to satisfy your nitpick, it will behave as if it knows) that those thorn characters are atypical.

      • midribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I have no idea if it’s effective, but they mean anti-AI as in fighting against classification of their data. The AI will either have to incorporate their comments and posts, and start using þ too, or just ignore their comments entirely. Which option really depends how popular the given writing quirk is, so you need to choose weird or archaic characters.

        • Bo7a@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          4 days ago

          Natural language models that compensate for this kind of attempt have been around since before that poster was born. It is silly vanity “hey look, people recognize me”. Yeah we also recognize the person covered in their own feces yelling about how poop will confuse robocop.

        • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’s not effective. In fact, the funny part is it’s actually more helpful to the AI. It is exactly inverse to his goal.

          Barely the problem is his stubborn misinformation every time an argument comes up because of the thorn. His actual use of the thorn itself is whatever no one really should care.

          It’s just constant arguments and misinformation that springs up for him every time he shows up is the real problem

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            4 days ago

            Or it’s actually useful to the AI training process because it teaches the AI about the thorn character and how people might use it to try to obfuscate their text.

          • midribbon_action@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            4 days ago

            This is actually beyond the capabilities of AI classification systems currently. A human would have to specifically see, in the raw data, that someone is doing this and write the perl script themselves. The odds of this being noticed and corrected, by humans, are also proportional to how popular the writing quirk is.

        • Havatra@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Ah, in that sense! I think it’s about is inefficient as the other reason honestly. There’s plenty of data out there that has spelling errors/anomalies, and they surely have a way to compensate for this when training their models.

    • KSP Atlas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s not an anti AI thing and I have no idea why people keep repeating this misinformation

      It’s an internet phenomenon, called Bring Back Thorn, which has been around since before LLMs became popular

        • KSP Atlas@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Oh my bad, I didn’t know that was the actual reason

          Most other thorn-users I’ve interacted with were doing it out of an attempt to reform English spelling so

          • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yep, it’s just one dude who’s very adamant about it argues all the time has endless amounts of misinformation about how AI works and is generally kind of an a******.

            Frankly, if all it was was he was just using the Thorn. I don’t think anyone would care.

    • 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      Maybe 15 years ago, I had a JavaScript snippet that constructed my email address and inserted it onto a page. I bet that’s useless nowadays because the bots run Chrome headless or something.

      • howrar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 days ago

        Require a specific interaction from the user to display your actual email (e.g. click on a button). Even if they run a headless browser, they’ll still have to parse the page to figure out what to do and then do it. That’s much more expensive.

    • BlueÆther@no.lastname.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Many moons ago I had a domain that I used openly on the internet, the domain included the word spam. I think they were the only email address that I never got spam to.

    • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      3 days ago

      Idiot is a very strong word to describe this. For a place so typically welcoming of neurodivergence this feels really dissonant in the grand scheme of things.

      I get major ick vibes from this particular take on the situation.

      • balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s neurodivergent now to decide you’re going to deliberately misspell words with characters from centuries ago in order to be fake-different and gain attention? Amazing how far we’ve come in like 5-10 years.

        • tomenzgg@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          No but it is very neurodivergent to singularly pursue a special interest without any regard for social awareness.

          And very neurotypical to label that person as annoying or just doing it for attention.

      • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Actually using the thorn isn’t so much the problem. It’s the misinformation. He constantly spreads in the b******* along with it.

        If he was just doing it to do it, I don’t think anyone would really care.

        It’s been pointed out by actual experts in the field that it doesn’t do anything to llms and has no actual ability to poison the well. At this point. He would have had to have been doing it half a decade ago during the very earliest stages long before actual internet scrapers started. Which basically makes the whole exercise pointless.

        So if you want to use a thorn use a thorn but just use it to use it. Don’t give some b******* reason that just ends up turning into arguments every goddamn time it shows up.

        • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          So if you want to use a word use a word but just use it. Don’t give some bullshit filtering with *’s every goddamn time it shows up.

          Also it’s fine to use goddamn but not bullshit? I’d guess this was some voice to text thing, but the asterisks were properly escaped.