• higgsboson@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    150
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Mr Bruce hears the same joke at least every week, so it isnt funny to him anymore. Everyone else either didnt get it or rolled their eyes.

    source: haver of a memey name. been through this countless times.

  • Sertou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    There is a Batman villain or tragic anti-hero named “Manbat” whose real name is Kirk Langstrom. Perhaps Wayne Bruce was confused by being called by the name Langstrom’s alter ego.

  • Godort@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    5 days ago

    Maybe they’re all big comics nerds and are confused because Manbat’s alter ego is Dr. Kirk Langstrom

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s just pavlovian at this point. You’ve screenshot something, so naturally you have to blur the name and profile picture. Zero thought involved.

      Ironically it’s really hard to find the original source because this is being shared and reshared so often and I gave up after 6 seconds

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    I got it right away, but an even smaller amount of people would realize that there is a Manbat, a villain opposing Batman.

    There is no Manspider btw, but there are a few artist conceptions, and they are horrible. Makes Manbat seem friendly.

  • _stranger_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    Once saw a guy named Wayne Batman. He was in his eighties, and this was the early 2000’s, so he actually predated Batman.

  • cRazi_man@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Man, it is such a sad sight IRL when no one gets it. They’re confused asking what you’re talking about. You try explaining and they’re all acting like this is some in comprehensible nonsense that they can’t understand and isn’t funny.

    The only thing worse is when only one person gets it and no one else does. Now you’ve got one person laughing saying “I see what you did there” and then having to explain to the others.

    • potoooooooo ☑️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I agree with the first point, but “only one person getting it” is how friendships are often made.

      Friendship arises out of mere Companionship when two or more of the companions discover that they have in common some insight or interest or even taste which the others do not share and which, till that moment, each believed to be his own unique treasure (or burden). The typical expression of opening Friendship would be something like, “What? You too? I thought I was the only one.” We can imagine that among those early hunters and warriors single individuals — one in a century? one in a thousand years? — saw what others did not; saw that the deer was beautiful as well as edible, that hunting was fun as well as necessary, dreamed that his gods might be not only powerful but holy. But as long as each of these percipient persons dies without finding a kindred soul, nothing (I suspect) will come of it; art or sport or spiritual religion will not be born. It is when two such persons discover one another, when, whether with immense difficulties and semi-articulate fumblings or with what would seem to us amazing and elliptical speed, they share their vision — it is then that Friendship is born. And instantly they stand together in an immense solitude. (C.S. Lewis, The Four Loves)

      Neither the book, nor ol’ Clive himself, are without issues. His definitions can be a little questionable. But he had a hell of a way with words.