• Jax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I’ve enjoyed a great deal of movies with Connery as the lead. I think he made the right choice not being Gandalf.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Connery even made a Michael Bay movie watchable.

    There’s not many actors that can say that.

  • RobMyBot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Okay, but hear me out. Zardoz is good.

    I know it looks goofy, and it IS goofy. But it’s also GOOD.

    • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The director’s commentary is so delightfully honest, right at the top he’s like “so I’ll be the first to admit, this film kinda got away from us,”

      Quoting from memory. But that was the gist.

  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I heard this story, not sure if it’s true, but I choose to believe it and will not hear any corrections; apparently, he was approached about Gandalf, but he turned it down because he didn’t really understand it. Then he was approached about Dumbledore, but turned it down because he didn’t really understand it. After seeing how those two franchises turned out, he said, “screw it, I’m taking the next role that I don’t get.” That role was Alan Quartermaine in League of Extraordinary Gentleman. After that movie bombed he retired from acting altogether.

    • BluesF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      16 hours ago

      That role was Alan Quartermaine in League of Extraordinary Gentleman. After that movie bombed he retired from acting altogether.

      Which is a shame really because I remember it being… Kinda good? Clearly not a work of great art, but fun action silliness. Admittedly I watched it as a kid and never again so who knows really.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        With adult eyes, it’s pretty bad. Also, it’s an adaptation of a much better Alan Moore graphic novel.

      • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It has some of the worst dialogue and pacing of any movie I’ve ever seen. I can see how it would be fun as a kid, but even as a teenager, it sucked ass.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I’d also argue that however the movie did after the fact, turning down roles you don’t understand is probably the smarter option. Maybe those other movies would have also flopped if they had Connery in those roles.

      Like I can’t picture him doing a good Gandalf. It wouldn’t be Gandalf, it would be Sean Connery in a wizard outfit. I can’t think of any roles where Connery played someone who wasn’t Sean Connery. He brought a lot of charisma to his roles but not a ton of range.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I agree that he wouldn’t have been right for either part, but I’m sure they still would have been very successful franchises. Also, he probably wouldn’t have gotten either part (definitely not Gandalf), they were just approaching him about it. Producers on Batman (1989) were in talks with Bill Murray and Pierce Brosnan before they moved on to Michael Keaton, but it’s pretty unlikely either one would have made it.

      • BluesF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Jesus can you actually imagine if LOTR had Sean Connery instead of Ian McKellen? Hideous prospect. No shade to Connery, he’s played some of my favourite characters over the years, but christ that would have been a terrible mistake.

          • Rooty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            “You shall not pash!”

            “Is it shecret? Is it shafe?”

            “When did Sharuman the wishe replace hish wishdom with madnessh?”

            You could play this game all day long

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    136
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t think he’ he’d be a good Gandalf anyways

    nothing against him, but what we got was perfect.

  • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    1 day ago

    To be fair to Connery, Zardoz was right after 007. He was type casted and nobody would hire him. He had to do something different to get new work. Also, Zardoz is legit a good movie… If you get past the weird and laughable aesthetic choices, the plot is a decent sci fi plot.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Zardoz is legit a good movie

      I assumed it was going to be, but when I watched I found it aggressively terrible.

      • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        But, did you watch it a second time? Honestly it’s awful the first watch because you can’t get past the aesthetic of it. When I watched it again I realized the movie itself is pretty good. It’s practically the definition of a good bad movie.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I have not. Maybe I’ll try it again someday because I actually have more than once hated a movie first try and liked it on second viewing.

          • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            18 hours ago

            I don’t blame you. I took a long time between viewings. I liked it enough that I had my goalie mask painted like the big stone head. I figured it was funny and a stone head was appropriate for a goalie.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Zardoz is legit a good movie

      Well, ok. But we are comparing it with the Lord of the Rings trilogy.

      (But then, committing to a trilogy probably has a huge opportunity cost.)

      • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 day ago

        Bear in mind that very few people thought a film adaptation of LOTR was actually going to be any good. It seems obvious now, but it was not seen a really viable project with how trilogies were made at the time (with many years between them) the amount of budget needed, and the effects challenges. The guys who made the movies deserve a lot of credit for doing something so well that it looks obvious when they are done, but little thinks like how to do the hobbits were seen as effects challenges with no real solution that wouldn’t look stupid or be insanely expensive.

        Connery would have been the biggest name in the film and getting attached to something that wound up looking like shit or making him look stupid would have been a bigger problem for him than anyone. Again, its obvious that they turned out great, but look at what Peter Jackson made before this and its not really as obvious a choice as one would think now (although I am personally a fan of his early work, I get why people might not be and why people maybe wouldn’t hand him the biggest film franchise in history).

        And just for a fun tidbit, at the time that Connery bailed on the offer the film was being produced by Weinstein, so I get maybe not wanting to work with that dirtbag. They almost lost Liv Tyler for the same reason and reportedly did lose them Ashley Judd and Mia Sorvino, who flat out refused to be attached to anything involving him.

  • bizarroland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    23 hours ago

    There was a population boost in the town they filmed Zardoz in due to all of the drug-induced revelry that was going on during the making of that movie.

    There is a good chance that town is populated with tens if not scores of Sean Connery’s illegitimate grandchildren now.

  • Ghostie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    “And sho do all who live to shee shuch timesh. But that ish not for them to deshide. All we have to deshide ish what to do with the time that ish give to ush.”